200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31312846)
1. Reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse repairs with biologic and synthetic grafts in a large population-based cohort.
Sohlberg EM; Dallas KB; Weeks BT; Elliott CS; Rogo-Gupta L
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 31312846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Impacts the All Cause Risk of Reoperation after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair? A Comparison of Mesh and Native Tissue Approaches in 110,329 Women.
Dallas KB; Rogo-Gupta L; Elliott CS
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 29510170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.
Wu YM; Reid J; Chou Q; MacMillan B; Leong Y; Welk B
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 30327850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Concomitant Hysterectomy and Repeat Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in a Cohort of Nearly 100,000 Women.
Dallas K; Elliott CS; Syan R; Sohlberg E; Enemchukwu E; Rogo-Gupta L
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 132(6):1328-1336. PubMed ID: 30334856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Care Seeking Patterns for Women Requiring a Repeat Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Due to Native Tissue Repair Failure Compared to a Mesh Complication.
Dallas KB; Trimble R; Rogo-Gupta L; Elliott CS
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():70-75. PubMed ID: 30170088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI-MESH registry.
Fritel X; de Tayrac R; de Keizer J; Campagne-Loiseau S; Cosson M; Ferry P; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Wagner L; Debodinance P; Saussine C; Pizzoferrato AC; Carlier-Guérin C; Thubert T; Panel L; Bosset PO; Nkounkou E; Ramanah R; Boisramé T; Charles T; Raiffort C; Charvériat A; Ragot S; Fauconnier A
BJOG; 2022 Mar; 129(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 34541781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center.
Warembourg S; Labaki M; de Tayrac R; Costa P; Fatton B
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1139-1151. PubMed ID: 28150032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study.
Wihersaari O; Karjalainen P; Tolppanen AM; Mattsson N; Jalkanen J; Nieminen K
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 33156186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in a nationwide cohort (FINPOP 2015).
Mattsson NK; Karjalainen P; Tolppanen AM; Heikkinen AM; Jalkanen J; Härkki P; Nieminen K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Apr; 98(4):451-459. PubMed ID: 30578530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adverse events associated with pelvic organ prolapse surgeries that use implants.
Wong KS; Nguyen JN; White T; Menefee SA; Walter AJ; Krulewitch CJ; Anderson-Smits CT; Jakus-Waldman SM
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 24201675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
Vandendriessche D; Sussfeld J; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Behal H; Cosson M
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 27549223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the 2011 FDA transvaginal mesh safety update on AUGS members' use of synthetic mesh and biologic grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Clemons JL; Weinstein M; Guess MK; Alperin M; Moalli P; Gregory WT; Lukacz ES; Sung VW; Chen BH; Bradley CS;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(4):191-8. PubMed ID: 23797515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study - results from the PROSPECT Study.
Glazener C; Breeman S; Elders A; Hemming C; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; McDonald A; McPherson G; MacLennan G; Norrie J
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(95):1-452. PubMed ID: 28052810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Forde JC; Chughtai B; Anger JT; Mao J; Sedrakyan A
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 28091710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.
Dandolu V; Akiyama M; Allenback G; Pathak P
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 27562466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries.
Khan AA; Eilber KS; Clemens JQ; Wu N; Pashos CL; Anger JT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 212(4):463.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25446663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary on: Reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse repairs with biologic and synthetic grafts in a large population-based cohort.
Patnam R
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):303. PubMed ID: 31673795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of Colpocleisis Outcomes in an Older Population Based Cohort.
Dallas KB; Anger JT; Rogo-Gupta L; Elliott CS
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):191-198. PubMed ID: 32648798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
