217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31313069)
1. A comparison of Icare PRO and Perkins tonometers in anesthetized children.
Serafino M; Villani E; Lembo A; Rabbiolo G; Specchia C; Trivedi RH; Nucci P
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 31313069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Icare-Pro Rebound Tonometer Versus Hand-held Applanation Tonometer for Pediatric Screening.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernández C; Valls-Ferran I; Puertas-Bordallo D
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Nov; 55(6):382-386. PubMed ID: 30074606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Axial Length on Intraocular Pressure Measurement With Three Tonometers in Childhood Glaucoma.
Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Sanchez Jean R; Garcia-Feljoo J
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Jan; 57(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 31972037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Icare-Pro Rebound Tonometer Versus the Hand-held Applanation Tonometer in Congenital Glaucoma.
Borrego Sanz L; Morales-Fernandez L; Martínez de-la-Casa JM; Sáenz-Francés F; Fuentes M; García-Feijóo J
J Glaucoma; 2016 Feb; 25(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 25333612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Perkins applanation tonometer in children under general anesthesia.
Chagny M; Stolowy N; Denis D; Sauvan L
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Nov; 46(9):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 37210292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening.
Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between rebound (Icare ic200) and applanation tonometry (Perkins) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Morales-Fernandez L; Pérez-García P; Saenz-Frances F; Molero-Senosiain M; Garcia-Saenz S; Dora Mendez C; Santos Bueso E; Garcia-Feijoo J; Martinez-de-la-Casa JM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):663-668. PubMed ID: 33354920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Icare tonometer and the hand-held goldmann applanation tonometer in pediatric aphakia.
Li Y; Tang L; Xiao M; Jia S; Liu P; Zhou Y; Chen H; Zeng J
J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):550-4. PubMed ID: 23007161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement of iCare IC200 tonometry with Perkins applanation tonometry in healthy children.
Stoddard-Bennett T; Jackson NJ; Robbins L; Villanueva P; Suh SY; Demer JL; Pineles SL; Fung SSM
J AAPOS; 2022 Oct; 26(5):235.e1-235.e5. PubMed ID: 36122876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement among three tonometers.
Sánchez Pavón I; Cañadas P; Martin R
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):808-812. PubMed ID: 31943335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):e66-73. PubMed ID: 23837834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the influence of corneal properties and densitometry on applanation and rebound tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma.
Molero-Senosiain M; Morales-Fernandez L; Saenz-Frances F; Kwan J; Garcia Feijoo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Mar; 46(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 36739259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy individuals.
Duran M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Dec; 46(10):1195-1203. PubMed ID: 37666735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of reproducibility, evaluation, and preference of the new iC100 rebound tonometer versus iCare PRO and Perkins portable applanation tonometry.
Molero-Senosiaín M; Morales-Fernández L; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 31565972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
