BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31313071)

  • 1. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Serin KR; Gultekin FA; Batman B; Ay S; Kapran Y; Saglam S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 26531198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.
    Nikolic A; Waters PS; Peacock O; Choi CC; Rajkomar A; Heriot AG; Smart P; Warrier S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):633-641. PubMed ID: 31625075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Shadmanov N; Guven K; Bakır B; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    Updates Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(8):2201-2209. PubMed ID: 37955804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sphincter-Saving Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Provides Better Mesorectal Specimen and Good Oncological Local Control Compared with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Mid-Low Rectal Cancer.
    Aliyev V; Goksel S; Bakir B; Guven K; Asoglu O
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():160-166. PubMed ID: 33537982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Huseynov E; Mustafayev TZ; Kayku V; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 36943657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Hon SS; Mak TW; Ngo DK; Leung WW; Leung KL
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):297-306. PubMed ID: 24013470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.
    Sugoor P; Verma K; Chaturvedi A; Kannan S; Desouza A; Ostwal V; Engineer R; Saklani A
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1965. PubMed ID: 30318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME.
    Chen YT; Kiu KT; Yen MH; Chang TC
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 30318319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives.
    Vignali A; Elmore U; Milone M; Rosati R
    Updates Surg; 2019 Mar; 71(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 30734896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.