These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31313071)

  • 1. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Serin KR; Gultekin FA; Batman B; Ay S; Kapran Y; Saglam S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 26531198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.
    Nikolic A; Waters PS; Peacock O; Choi CC; Rajkomar A; Heriot AG; Smart P; Warrier S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):633-641. PubMed ID: 31625075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Shadmanov N; Guven K; Bakır B; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    Updates Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(8):2201-2209. PubMed ID: 37955804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sphincter-Saving Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Provides Better Mesorectal Specimen and Good Oncological Local Control Compared with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Mid-Low Rectal Cancer.
    Aliyev V; Goksel S; Bakir B; Guven K; Asoglu O
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():160-166. PubMed ID: 33537982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Huseynov E; Mustafayev TZ; Kayku V; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 36943657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Hon SS; Mak TW; Ngo DK; Leung WW; Leung KL
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):297-306. PubMed ID: 24013470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.
    Sugoor P; Verma K; Chaturvedi A; Kannan S; Desouza A; Ostwal V; Engineer R; Saklani A
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1965. PubMed ID: 30318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME.
    Chen YT; Kiu KT; Yen MH; Chang TC
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 30318319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives.
    Vignali A; Elmore U; Milone M; Rosati R
    Updates Surg; 2019 Mar; 71(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 30734896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.