BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31313259)

  • 21. Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Among Three Skeletal Classes in Adult Pakistani Subjects.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1420-5. PubMed ID: 26260364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in Korean adults.
    Hwang HS; Park MK; Lee WJ; Cho JH; Kim BK; Wilkinson CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1442-7. PubMed ID: 22621203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of nasal profiles for forensic facial approximation in a modern Korean population of known age and sex.
    Lee UY; Kim H; Song JK; Kim DH; Ahn KJ; Kim YS
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Feb; 42():101646. PubMed ID: 31751793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions.
    Simpson E; Henneberg M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Jun; 118(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 12012365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial soft tissue thickness of Colombian adults.
    Perlaza Ruiz NA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):160.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23587676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The application of the central limit theorem and the law of large numbers to facial soft tissue depths: T-Table robustness and trends since 2008.
    Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):454-62. PubMed ID: 24313424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study.
    Short LJ; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Erolin C; Rynn C; Wilkinson C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():147.e1-147.e8. PubMed ID: 24529418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using Computed Tomography (CT) Data to Build 3D Resources for Forensic Craniofacial Identification.
    Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti CRS; Falsetti AB
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2021; 1317():53-74. PubMed ID: 33945132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ultrasonic assessment of facial soft tissue thicknesses in adult Egyptians.
    El-Mehallawi IH; Soliman EM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Mar; 117(1-2):99-107. PubMed ID: 11230951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Construction and analysis of a head CT-scan database for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Tilotta F; Richard F; Glaunès J; Berar M; Gey S; Verdeille S; Rozenholc Y; Gaudy JF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):112.e1-12. PubMed ID: 19665327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic review on forensic craniofacial reconstruction. I. facial soft-tissue thickness.
    Sehrawat JS; Ahlawat B
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2023 Jul; 35(2):107-136. PubMed ID: 37531497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The study on facial soft tissue thickness using Han population in Xinjiang.
    Wang J; Zhao X; Mi C; Raza I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():585.e1-585.e5. PubMed ID: 27216250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Midsagittal facial soft tissue thickness norms in an adult Mediterranean population.
    Ayoub F; Saadeh M; Rouhana G; Haddad R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():217.e1-217.e7. PubMed ID: 30455033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does sexual dimorphism in facial soft tissue depths justify sex distinction in craniofacial identification?
    Stephan CN; Norris RM; Henneberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 15932080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Who is this person? A comparison study of current three-dimensional facial approximation methods.
    Decker S; Ford J; Davy-Jow S; Faraut P; Neville W; Hilbelink D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):161.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23628365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Considerations associated with computer forensic facial reconstructions the limits of soft tissues' thickness determination.
    Chistol RO; Furnică C; Moraru M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 20191828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial approximation for identification purposes: soft tissue thickness in a Caucasian population. Sex and age-related variations.
    De Donno A; Mele F; Angrisani C; Maselli R; Cozzolino M; Pedote P; Introna F; Santoro V
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2022 Apr; 40(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 35499535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between average tissue depth data and quantitative accuracy of forensic craniofacial reconstructions measured by geometric surface comparison method.
    Lee WJ; Wilkinson CM; Hwang HS; Lee SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):572-80. PubMed ID: 25739646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Re-assessment of South African juvenile facial soft tissue thickness data for craniofacial approximation: A comparative analysis using central tendency statistics.
    Briers N; Steyn M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():280.e1-280.e13. PubMed ID: 30213707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Facial soft tissue thickness among various vertical facial patterns in adult Pakistani subjects.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():517.e1-517.e6. PubMed ID: 26476716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.