These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31313678)

  • 1. Surveillance Mammography After Breast Conservation Therapy: Is Tomosynthesis Worth It?
    Hasan S; Gresswell S; Colosimo B; Weinberger K; Anderson S; Abel S; Bigbee M; Shindel B; Hilton C; Julian T; Trombetta M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Aug; 42(8):682-686. PubMed ID: 31313678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Cost-Effectiveness of Using Private and Medicare Insurance in Community-Based Health Care Facilities.
    Hunter SA; Morris C; Nelson K; Snyder BJ; Poulton TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 28177646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Majid SZ; Senapati GM; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Mar; 107():110063. PubMed ID: 38232642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis.
    Amir T; Ambinder EB; Harvey SC; Oluyemi ET; Jones MK; Honig E; Alvin MD; Mullen LA
    J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 33334233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Sebuødegård S; Bandos AI; Gur D; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Hofvind S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29429017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
    Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
    Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
    Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.