180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31314730)
21. Preoperative and intraoperative sonographic visibility of collagen-based breast biopsy marker clips.
Eby PR; Calhoun KE; Kurland BF; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Anderson BO; Byrd DR; Mann GN; Lehman CD
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 20042350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation.
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; García-Alvarez MN; Ulloa-Gómez JL; Romero-Trejo C; Sepúlveda-Méndez J
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 18181162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic Seeds: An Alternative to Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions.
Kelly BN; Webster AJ; Lamb L; Spivey T; Korotkin JE; Henriquez A; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Lehman CR; Smith BL; Specht MC
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e700-e707. PubMed ID: 35101354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical utility of radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer: A retrospective single institutional cohort study.
Aljohani B; Jumaa K; Kornecki A; Brackstone M
Int J Surg; 2018 Dec; 60():149-152. PubMed ID: 30439537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization.
Gray RJ; Salud C; Nguyen K; Dauway E; Friedland J; Berman C; Peltz E; Whitehead G; Cox CE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):711-5. PubMed ID: 11597011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Dash N; Chafin SH; Johnson RR; Contractor FM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):911-7. PubMed ID: 10511147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detectability of Hygroscopic Clips Used in Breast Cancer Surgery.
Carmon M; Olsha O; Gekhtman D; Nikitin I; Cohen Y; Messing M; Lioubashevsky N; Abu Dalo R; Hadar T; Golomb E
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Feb; 36(2):401-408. PubMed ID: 28039936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Multiple Wire, Radioactive Seed, and Savi Scout
Srour MK; Kim S; Amersi F; Giuliano AE; Chung A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):2212-2218. PubMed ID: 32989660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Combi F; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Regolo L; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Mazzucchelli S; Sorrentino L
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 30742309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sonographically guided metalic clip placement for tumour localization in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Shahzad R; Masood M; Shahid A; Mirza ZR; Cheema FE; Fatima I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Oct; 69(10):1501-1504. PubMed ID: 31622305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasound-Guided Versus Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer.
Eggemann H; Costa SD; Ignatov A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 26439275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy.
Sung JS; King V; Thornton CM; Brooks JD; Fry CW; El-Tamer M; Dauer LT; Brogi E; St Germain JM; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1453-7. PubMed ID: 23684386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.
Stelle L; Schoenheit T; Brubaker A; Tang X; Qu P; Cradock K; Higham A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):131-136. PubMed ID: 29134380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiofrequency identification tag localization is comparable to wire localization for non-palpable breast lesions.
McGugin C; Spivey T; Coopey S; Smith B; Kelly B; Gadd M; Hughes K; Dontchos B; Specht M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Oct; 177(3):735-739. PubMed ID: 31302856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Sartani A; Bossi D; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Truffi M; Bonzini M; Foschi D
Am J Surg; 2015 Jun; 209(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 25457243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgeon-led Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Cancers: Results of 5 Years of Practice.
Gerrard AD; Shrotri A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):e748-e752. PubMed ID: 31208875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of two non-radioactive alternatives to wire for the localization of non-palpable breast cancers.
Lee MK; Sanaiha Y; Kusske AM; Thompson CK; Attai DJ; Baker JL; Fischer CP; DiNome ML
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 32451679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Physician preference and patient satisfaction with radioactive seed versus wire localization.
Romanoff A; Schmidt H; McMurray M; Burnett A; Condren A; Port E
J Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 210():177-180. PubMed ID: 28457325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.
Krekel NM; Zonderhuis BM; Stockmann HB; Schreurs WH; van der Veen H; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21194880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
