149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31315060)
1. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1509-1521. PubMed ID: 31953731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies.
Hwang JH
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 48(17):3177-85. PubMed ID: 22824588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The incidence of perioperative lymphatic complications after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between robotic and laparoscopic approach : a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2478-2485. PubMed ID: 37195800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim B
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):e9. PubMed ID: 37857564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
