These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31315509)

  • 21. Superset versus substitution-letter priming: an evaluation of open-bigram models.
    Lupker SJ; Zhang YJ; Perry JR; Davis CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 25485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of consonant/vowel organization in perceptual discrimination.
    Chetail F; Drabs V; Content A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):938-61. PubMed ID: 24749964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.
    Kinoshita S; Gayed M; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1661-1671. PubMed ID: 30307268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: is there a cross-language difference?
    Sánchez-Gutiérrez C; Rastle K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 23543423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements?
    Marcet A; Perea M; Baciero A; Gomez P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 29969979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects.
    Meade G; Mahnich C; Holcomb PJ; Grainger J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 21(5):948-959. PubMed ID: 33954926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals.
    Nakayama M; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1168-1185. PubMed ID: 29683717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.
    Perea M; Mallouh RA; Carreiras M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20551361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions.
    Perea M; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(6):384-93. PubMed ID: 19130764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.
    Kinoshita S; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19210078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tracking the emergence of the consonant bias in visual-word recognition: evidence with developing readers.
    Soares AP; Perea M; Comesaña M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88580. PubMed ID: 24523917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic interpretability does not influence masked priming effects.
    Tseng H; Lindsay S; Davis CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):856-867. PubMed ID: 31813328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transposed-letter priming effects in reading aloud words and nonwords.
    Mousikou P; Kinoshita S; Wu S; Norris D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1437-42. PubMed ID: 25665798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masked form priming as a function of letter position: An evaluation of current orthographic coding models.
    Lupker SJ; Spinelli G; Davis CJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2349-2366. PubMed ID: 31829650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming.
    Ktori M; Kingma B; Hannagan T; Holcomb PJ; Grainger J
    J Cogn Psychol (Hove); 2014 Aug; 26(5):491-505. PubMed ID: 25364497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Many ways to read your vowels--Neural processing of diacritics and vowel letters in Hebrew.
    Weiss Y; Katzir T; Bitan T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():10-9. PubMed ID: 26188258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming.
    Carreiras M; Duñabeitia JA; Molinaro N
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2659-70. PubMed ID: 19273459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: are consonants processed differently from vowels?
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Perea M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 419(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17507160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masked priming by misspellings: Word frequency moderates the effects of SOA and prime-target similarity.
    Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):262-77. PubMed ID: 26530310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.