272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31315633)
1. Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling.
Durandau G; Farina D; Asín-Prieto G; Dimbwadyo-Terrer I; Lerma-Lara S; Pons JL; Moreno JC; Sartori M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 31315633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A hybrid BMI-based exoskeleton for paresis: EMG control for assisting arm movements.
Kawase T; Sakurada T; Koike Y; Kansaku K
J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb; 14(1):016015. PubMed ID: 28068293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical feasibility of gait training with a robotic exoskeleton (WPAL) in an individual with both incomplete cervical and complete thoracic spinal cord injury: A case study.
Tanabe S; Koyama S; Saitoh E; Hirano S; Yatsuya K; Tsunoda T; Katoh M; Gotoh T; Furumoto A
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 28527225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuromechanical adaptations during a robotic powered exoskeleton assisted walking session.
Ramanujam A; Cirnigliaro CM; Garbarini E; Asselin P; Pilkar R; Forrest GF
J Spinal Cord Med; 2018 Sep; 41(5):518-528. PubMed ID: 28427305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assistive powered exoskeleton for complete spinal cord injury: correlations between walking ability and exoskeleton control.
Guanziroli E; Cazzaniga M; Colombo L; Basilico S; Legnani G; Molteni F
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Apr; 55(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30156088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
Zhou X; Zheng L
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience of Robotic Exoskeleton Use at Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.
Heinemann AW; Jayaraman A; Mummidisetty CK; Spraggins J; Pinto D; Charlifue S; Tefertiller C; Taylor HB; Chang SH; Stampas A; Furbish CL; Field-Fote EC
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2018 Oct; 42(4):256-267. PubMed ID: 30199518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI Model Systems.
Pinto D; Garnier M; Barbas J; Chang SH; Charlifue S; Field-Fote E; Furbish C; Tefertiller C; Mummidisetty CK; Taylor H; Jayaraman A; Heinemann AW
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New generation emerging technologies for neurorehabilitation and motor assistance.
Frisoli A; Solazzi M; Loconsole C; Barsotti M
Acta Myol; 2016 Dec; 35(3):141-144. PubMed ID: 28484314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of robotic assistance using poststroke residual voluntary effort.
Makowski NS; Knutson JS; Chae J; Crago PE
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Mar; 23(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 25373107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accelerometry-enabled measurement of walking performance with a robotic exoskeleton: a pilot study.
Lonini L; Shawen N; Scanlan K; Rymer WZ; Kording KP; Jayaraman A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Mar; 13():35. PubMed ID: 27037035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volition-adaptive control for gait training using wearable exoskeleton: preliminary tests with incomplete spinal cord injury individuals.
Rajasekaran V; López-Larraz E; Trincado-Alonso F; Aranda J; Montesano L; Del-Ama AJ; Pons JL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 15(1):4. PubMed ID: 29298691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myoelectrically controlled wrist robot for stroke rehabilitation.
Song R; Tong KY; Hu X; Zhou W
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():52. PubMed ID: 23758925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lower extremity robotic exoskeleton training: Case studies for complete spinal cord injury walking.
Lemaire ED; Smith AJ; Herbert-Copley A; Sreenivasan V
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 28505991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness.
de Miguel-Fernández J; Lobo-Prat J; Prinsen E; Font-Llagunes JM; Marchal-Crespo L
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 36805777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of surface electromyography patterns of healthy and incomplete spinal cord injury subjects interacting with an upper-extremity exoskeleton.
McDonald CG; Dennis TA; O'Malley MK
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():164-169. PubMed ID: 28813812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trunk muscle activity patterns and motion patterns of patients with motor complete spinal cord injury at T8 and T10 walking with different un-powered exoskeletons.
Guan X; Kuai S; Ji L; Wang R; Ji R
J Spinal Cord Med; 2017 Jul; 40(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 28514926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of methods for achieving upper limb movement following spinal cord injury through hybrid muscle stimulation and robotic assistance.
Dunkelberger N; Schearer EM; O'Malley MK
Exp Neurol; 2020 Jun; 328():113274. PubMed ID: 32145251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies.
Proietti T; Crocher V; Roby-Brami A; Jarrasse N
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2016; 9():4-14. PubMed ID: 27071194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wearable exoskeleton control modes selected during overground walking affect muscle synergies in adults with a chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.
Escalona MJ; Bourbonnais D; Goyette M; Duclos C; Gagnon DH
Spinal Cord Ser Cases; 2020 Apr; 6(1):26. PubMed ID: 32332703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
