These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31317393)

  • 1. Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect.
    O'Rear AE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):127-144. PubMed ID: 31317393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.
    Ecker UKH; Antonio LM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 33452666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger and older adults' recall: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory.
    Barber SJ; Opitz PC; Martins B; Sakaki M; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 27112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections?
    Ithisuphalap J; Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):617-631. PubMed ID: 32302243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Would a madman have been so wise as this?" The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation.
    Foy JE; LoCasto PC; Briner SW; Dyar S
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):281-295. PubMed ID: 27726095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive false memory: Imagining future scenarios increases false memories in the DRM paradigm.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Grace L; van Esch L
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1076-84. PubMed ID: 27173584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrusive effects of implicitly processed information on explicit memory.
    Sentz DF; Kirkhart MW; LoPresto C; Sobelman S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 11883569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.
    Hinze SR; Slaten DG; Horton WS; Jenkins R; Rapp DN
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):305-24. PubMed ID: 24005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readers with Autism Can Produce Inferences, but they Cannot Answer Inferential Questions.
    Tirado MJ; Saldaña D
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 Mar; 46(3):1025-37. PubMed ID: 26547920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not wallowing in misery - retractions of negative misinformation are effective in depressive rumination.
    Chang EP; Ecker UKH; Page AC
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):991-1005. PubMed ID: 30319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Fenton O; Martin K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 24005789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knowing that you don't know: metamemory and discourse processing.
    Klin CM; Guzmán AE; Levine WH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1378-93. PubMed ID: 9372606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
    Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 34533754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking about the future can cause forgetting of the past.
    Ditta AS; Storm BC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 25874570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "It could have been worse": Developmental change in the use of a counterfactual consoling strategy.
    Payir A; Guttentag R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Aug; 148():119-30. PubMed ID: 27156177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation, false memories, and the planning of future events.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Grace L; Howe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 29698046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.