182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31317398)
1. Fully automated analysis for bone scintigraphy with artificial neural network: usefulness of bone scan index (BSI) in breast cancer.
Inaki A; Nakajima K; Wakabayashi H; Mochizuki T; Kinuya S
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):755-765. PubMed ID: 31317398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.
Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic superiority of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index over pretreatment whole-body volumetric-metabolic FDG-PET/CT metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Adams HJ; de Klerk JM; Fijnheer R; Heggelman BG; Dubois SV; Nievelstein RA; Kwee TC
Eur J Haematol; 2015 Jun; 94(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 25311082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel biomarker, active whole skeletal total lesion glycolysis (WS-TLG), as a quantitative method to measure bone metastatic activity in breast cancer patients.
Koizumi M; Motegi K; Umeda T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 33(7):502-511. PubMed ID: 30982124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG Avidity and Tumor Burden: Survival Outcomes for Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Taghipour M; Wray R; Sheikhbahaei S; Wright JL; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):846-55. PubMed ID: 27003053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of a computer-assisted diagnostic system: sensitivity of BONENAVI for bone scintigraphy in patients with disseminated skeletal metastasis is not so high.
Koizumi M; Motegi K; Koyama M; Ishiyama M; Togawa T; Makino T; Arisaka Y; Terauchi T
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):200-211. PubMed ID: 31970706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 32(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29134565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Could semiquantitative FDG analysis add information to the prognosis in patients with stage II/III breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment?
Evangelista L; Cervino AR; Ghiotto C; Saibene T; Michieletto S; Fernando B; Orvieto E; Guarneri V; Conte P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 26025244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Study of Serial
Peterson LM; O'Sullivan J; Wu QV; Novakova-Jiresova A; Jenkins I; Lee JH; Shields A; Montgomery S; Linden HM; Gralow J; Gadi VK; Muzi M; Kinahan P; Mankoff D; Specht JM
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29748233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of bone scans in advanced prostate carcinoma using fully automated and semi-automated bone scan index methods.
Takahashi Y; Yoshimura M; Suzuki K; Hashimoto T; Hirose H; Uchida K; Inoue S; Koizumi K; Tokuuye K
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Aug; 26(7):586-93. PubMed ID: 22744807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of whole-body total lesion glycolysis at pretreatment FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
Chen HH; Chiu NT; Su WC; Guo HR; Lee BF
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22692034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
