These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31318260)

  • 1. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.
    Ferro GM; Sornette D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243661. PubMed ID: 33315897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory and decision making: Effects of sequential presentation of probabilities and outcomes in risky prospects.
    Millroth P; Guath M; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):304-324. PubMed ID: 29878808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
    Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1516-23. PubMed ID: 16873105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk Preferences in Surrogate Decision Making.
    Batteux E; Ferguson E; Tunney RJ
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):290-297. PubMed ID: 28922998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
    Tsetsos K; Usher M; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1275-93. PubMed ID: 21038979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk.
    Stewart N; Chater N; Stott HP; Reimers S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Mar; 132(1):23-46. PubMed ID: 12656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust me; I know what I am doing investigating the effect of choice list elicitation and domain-relevant training on preference reversals in decision making for others.
    Neumann-Böhme S; Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jul; 22(5):679-697. PubMed ID: 33743093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.
    Voigt K; Murawski C; Speer S; Bode S
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 30530856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observers penalize decision makers whose risk preferences are unaffected by loss-gain framing.
    Dorison CA; Heller BH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2043-2059. PubMed ID: 35143249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note.
    Bhatia S; Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Oct; 124(5):678-687. PubMed ID: 28569526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monoamines and assessment of risks.
    Takahashi H
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):1062-7. PubMed ID: 22749131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals?
    Guassi Moreira JF; Tashjian SM; Galván A; Silvers JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1509-1526. PubMed ID: 31804124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.
    Lee D; Daunizeau J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231081. PubMed ID: 32421699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior cingulate activity modulates nonlinear decision weight function of uncertain prospects.
    Paulus MP; Frank LR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):668-77. PubMed ID: 16321546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Analysis of Decision under Risk in Rats.
    Constantinople CM; Piet AT; Brody CD
    Curr Biol; 2019 Jun; 29(12):2066-2074.e5. PubMed ID: 31155352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive abilities affect decision errors but not risk preferences: A meta-analysis.
    Mechera-Ostrovsky T; Heinke S; Andraszewicz S; Rieskamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1719-1750. PubMed ID: 35352289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.