These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31318302)

  • 1. Hemodynamics and reverse remodeling associated with Mosaic, Perimount and Trifecta aortic bioprostheses.
    Kalogerakos PD; Kontopodis N; Ioannou CV; Kladou E; Chalkiadakis G; Athanasiou T; Lazopoulos G
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Aug; 16(8):743-751. PubMed ID: 31318302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Matched-Paired Comparative Analysis of the Hemodynamics of the Trifecta and Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses.
    Rubens FD; Rao RV; Chan V; Burwash IG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Jul; 24(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 26897822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability and Performance of 2298 Trifecta Aortic Valve Prostheses: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Yongue C; Lopez DC; Soltesz EG; Roselli EE; Bakaeen FG; Gillinov AM; Pettersson GB; Semple ME; Rajeswaran J; Tong MZ; Jaber W; Blackstone EH; Svensson LG; Johnston DR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 111(4):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 33011168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early in-vivo hemodynamic comparison of supra-annular aortic bioprostheses: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease.
    Modi A; Pousios D; Sadeque S; Velissaris T; Barlow C; Livesey S; Tsang GM; Ohri SK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 25296457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes and hemodynamics of the 19-mm Perimount Magna bioprosthesis in an aortic position: comparison with the 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic Ultra Valve.
    Okamura H; Yamaguchi A; Yoshizaki T; Nagano H; Itoh S; Morita H; Naito K; Yuri K; Adachi H
    Circ J; 2012; 76(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22094910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Freedom Solo Versus Trifecta Bioprotheses: Clinical and Hemodynamic Evaluation after Propensity Score Matching.
    J Cerqueira R; Melo R; Moreira S; A Saraiva F; Andrade M; Salgueiro E; Almeida J; J Amorim M; Pinho P; Lourenço A; F Leite-Moreira A
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2017; 24(3-4):121. PubMed ID: 29701353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magna Ease Versus Trifecta Early Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Yanagawa B; Tam DY; Hong K; Mazine A; Bagai A; Shahbaz NK; Ouzounian M; Verma S
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(4):267-272. PubMed ID: 30124587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Domoto S; Niinami H; Uwabe K; Koike H; Tabata M; Morita K; Kambe M; Iguchi A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 26467641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of small Perimount aortic valves in patients aged 75 years or older.
    Vitale N; Clark SC; Ramsden A; Hasan A; Hilton CJ; Holden MP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Jan; 75(1):35-9; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 12537189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR; Janusz MT; MacNab J; Henderson C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5 Suppl):S282-4. PubMed ID: 11388205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trifecta versus perimount bioprosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement; systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yokoyama Y; Kuno T; Takagi H; Fukuhara S
    J Card Surg; 2021 Nov; 36(11):4335-4342. PubMed ID: 34499386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valve Type, Size, and Deployment Location Affect Hemodynamics in an In Vitro Valve-in-Valve Model.
    Midha PA; Raghav V; Condado JF; Okafor IU; Lerakis S; Thourani VH; Babaliaros V; Yoganathan AP
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(15):1618-28. PubMed ID: 27491613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic Performance and Durability of Mosaic Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement, up to 13 Years.
    Matsumoto Y; Fujita T; Hata H; Shimahara Y; Sato S; Kobayashi J
    Circ J; 2015; 79(5):1044-51. PubMed ID: 25740500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.