These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31318359)

  • 1. Evaluating the effect of different operational strategies on the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants - case studies from northern Poland.
    Maktabifard M; Zaborowska E; Makinia J
    Water Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 79(11):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 31318359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy neutrality versus carbon footprint minimization in municipal wastewater treatment plants.
    Maktabifard M; Zaborowska E; Makinia J
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Mar; 300():122647. PubMed ID: 31891853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive evaluation of the carbon footprint components of wastewater treatment plants located in the Baltic Sea region.
    Maktabifard M; Awaitey A; Merta E; Haimi H; Zaborowska E; Mikola A; Mąkinia J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 1):150436. PubMed ID: 34563900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from the European urban wastewater sector, and options for their reduction.
    Parravicini V; Nielsen PH; Thornberg D; Pistocchi A
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 4):156322. PubMed ID: 35662596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decade of nitrous oxide (N
    Vasilaki V; Massara TM; Stanchev P; Fatone F; Katsou E
    Water Res; 2019 Sep; 161():392-412. PubMed ID: 31226538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive carbon footprint analysis of different wastewater treatment plant configurations.
    Wu Z; Duan H; Li K; Ye L
    Environ Res; 2022 Nov; 214(Pt 2):113818. PubMed ID: 35843274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the greenhouse gas emissions from China's wastewater treatment plants: Based on life cycle assessment coupled with statistical data.
    Chen W; Zhang Q; Hu L; Geng Y; Liu C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Jul; 259():115007. PubMed ID: 37209571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants.
    Gustavsson DJ; Tumlin S
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):887-93. PubMed ID: 23985520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use.
    Fine P; Hadas E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wastewater treatment process impact on energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions.
    Mamais D; Noutsopoulos C; Dimopoulou A; Stasinakis A; Lekkas TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 25633956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor in sludge line reduces greenhouse gas emissions in wastewater treatment system.
    Collivignarelli MC; Baldi M; Carnevale Miino M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 848():157794. PubMed ID: 35932854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward better understanding and feasibility of controlling greenhouse gas emissions from treatment of industrial wastewater with activated sludge.
    Chen WH; Yang JH; Yuan CS; Yang YH
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Oct; 23(20):20449-20461. PubMed ID: 27460025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment.
    Remy C; Lesjean B; Waschnewski J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 23128622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimizing N2O emissions and carbon footprint on a full-scale activated sludge sequencing batch reactor.
    Rodriguez-Caballero A; Aymerich I; Marques R; Poch M; Pijuan M
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():1-10. PubMed ID: 25577689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the conventional life cycle inventory in wastewater treatment plants.
    Lorenzo-Toja Y; Alfonsín C; Amores MJ; Aldea X; Marin D; Moreira MT; Feijoo G
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 553():71-82. PubMed ID: 26901804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel extended hybrid tool for real time control and practically support decisions to reduce GHG emissions in full scale wastewater treatment plants.
    Lancioni N; Szelag B; Sgroi M; Barbusiński K; Fatone F; Eusebi AL
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 365():121502. PubMed ID: 38936025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking the sustainability of sludge handling systems in small wastewater treatment plants.
    Archer G; Jin C; Parker W
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109893. PubMed ID: 31822457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion.
    Schaubroeck T; De Clippeleir H; Weissenbacher N; Dewulf J; Boeckx P; Vlaeminck SE; Wett B
    Water Res; 2015 May; 74():166-79. PubMed ID: 25727156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.
    Vergé XP; Maxime D; Dyer JA; Desjardins RL; Arcand Y; Vanderzaag A
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6091-104. PubMed ID: 23831091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.