These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3131845)

  • 21. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electron beam dose calculations.
    Hogstrom KR; Mills MD; Almond PR
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 May; 26(3):445-59. PubMed ID: 6787621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A method of calculating the output factors of arbitrarily shaped electron fields.
    McParland BJ
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 2921987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A model for electron-beam applicator scatter.
    Ebert MA; Hoban PW
    Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1419-29. PubMed ID: 8531867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electron beam dose planning using Gaussian beams. Improved radial dose profiles.
    Lax I; Brahme A; Andreo P
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():49-59. PubMed ID: 6316740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the final aperture superposition technique to calculate electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Chen J; Irion J; Faddegon BA
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3397-405. PubMed ID: 19746772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dual scattering foil design for poly-energetic electron beams.
    Kainz KK; Antolak JA; Almond PR; Bloch CD; Hogstrom KR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):755-67. PubMed ID: 15798252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dose calculation for very small irregular electron beam fields. 1. Dose calculation for the central beam using a simple field zone method].
    Gutt VF; Kuphal K; Hodapp N
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Sep; 166(9):603-9. PubMed ID: 2218865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimization of pencil beam widths for electron-beam dose calculations.
    Antolak JA; Mah E; Scrimger JW
    Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 7609721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of broad beam central axis depth dose curves from different accelerators using the universal depth dose curve model.
    Werner BL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():35-41. PubMed ID: 6316738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of measured pencil beam parameters for electron beam model evaluation.
    Higgins PD; Gerbi BJ; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 12722803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inclusion of compensator-induced scatter and beam filtration in pencil beam dose calculations.
    du Plessis FC; Willemse CA
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2896-904. PubMed ID: 16964866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dosimetric comparison of copper and Cerrobend electron inserts.
    Rusk BD; Carver RL; Gibbons JP; Hogstrom KR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):245–261. PubMed ID: 27685126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the initial angular variances of clinical electron beams.
    van Battum LJ; Huizenga H
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Nov; 44(11):2803-20. PubMed ID: 10588286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A model to determine the initial phase space of a clinical electron beam from measured beam data.
    Janssen JJ; Korevaar EW; van Battum LJ; Storchi PR; Huizenga H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Feb; 46(2):269-86. PubMed ID: 11229714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Accuracy of distribution of the doses obtained with electron beams of irregular shape and in the presence of inhomogeneous structures].
    Andreucci L; Ghiso G; Riccardi I; Schenone A
    Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4 Suppl 1):33-6. PubMed ID: 2251415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.