These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31318934)

  • 1. The acceptability judgment of Chinese pseudo-modifiers with and without a sentential context.
    Gong T; Shuai L; Wu Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219896. PubMed ID: 31318934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language Interfaces in Adult Heritage Language Acquisition: A Study on Encoding of Nominal Reference in Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language.
    Jin J; Ke SE; Lee JC
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():790102. PubMed ID: 35058851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From a Grammaticality Judgment Study of Indonesian.
    Aryawibawa IN; Ambridge B
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3135-3148. PubMed ID: 30375023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic Information and the Syntax of Propositional Attitude Verbs.
    White AS; Hacquard V; Lidz J
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):416-456. PubMed ID: 29052250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge.
    Lau JH; Clark A; Lappin S
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1202-1241. PubMed ID: 27732744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential cortical contribution of syntax and semantics: An fMRI study on two-word phrasal processing.
    Schell M; Zaccarella E; Friederici AD
    Cortex; 2017 Nov; 96():105-120. PubMed ID: 29024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classifiers as Count Syntax: Individuation and Measurement in the Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese.
    Li P; Barner D; Huang BH
    Lang Learn Dev; 2008 Oct; 4(4):249. PubMed ID: 20151047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonology competes with syntax: experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of Information Structure.
    Keller F; Alexopoulou T
    Cognition; 2001 May; 79(3):301-72. PubMed ID: 11165215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context.
    O'Seaghdha PG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):807-28. PubMed ID: 9231431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction: The acceptability judgment of Chinese pseudo-modifiers with and without a sentential context.
    PLOS ONE Staff
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221073. PubMed ID: 31390379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarity of wh-Phrases and Acceptability Variation in wh-Islands.
    Atkinson E; Apple A; Rawlins K; Omaki A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2048. PubMed ID: 26793156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.
    Froud K; van der Lely HK
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(3):274-303. PubMed ID: 18206904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of syntax on reading in neglect dyslexia.
    Friedmann N; Tzailer-Gross L; Gvion A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Aug; 49(10):2803-16. PubMed ID: 21679719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grounding by Attention Simulation in Peripersonal Space: Pupils Dilate to Pinch Grip But Not Big Size Nominal Classifier.
    Lobben M; Bochynska A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):576-599. PubMed ID: 28766754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.