343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31318962)
1. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT scans for the detection of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Yu W; Kou C; Bai W; Yu X; Duan R; Zhu B; Li Y; Hua W; Ren X; Yang Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220080. PubMed ID: 31318962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic value of PET/CT for the lymph node metastasis in Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Sun J; Li Y; Gong F; Xu S; Wu J; Wang H; He T
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 35913866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Luo Q; Luo L; Tang L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617742311. PubMed ID: 29343205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim SJ; Lee SW; Ha HK
Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30269140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade gliomas: A meta-analysis.
Zhang G; Li J; Hui X
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():935459. PubMed ID: 36061992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can quantitative parameters of spectral computed tomography predict lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang T; Fan Z; Zou L; Hou Y
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109643. PubMed ID: 36990392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis].
He MF; Jiang ZW; Hao ZW; An J; Zhai J; Shen JK
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 31874538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging evaluation of para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.
Zhu M; Zhuo Q; Liu W; Guan C; Zuo Y
Acta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 64(9):2611-2617. PubMed ID: 37321631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang P; Zhang L; Zheng S; Yu C; Xie M; Lv Q
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166716. PubMed ID: 27855188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT versus single time point 18FDG-PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Wang Y; Lei J; Tian J; Zhai Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):770-7. PubMed ID: 23528566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Xpert CT/NG for
Xie TA; Liu YL; Meng RC; Liu XS; Fang KY; Deng ST; Fan SJ; Chen CM; Lin QR; He ZJ; Li ZX; Ouyang S; Zhu GD; Ji TX; Xia Y; Pan ZY; Guo XG
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2892734. PubMed ID: 33102576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
