These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31319060)

  • 1. A comparison of 2 distal attachment mucosal exposure devices: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Sagi SV; Kessler WR; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Dewitt JM; Lahr RE; Searight MP; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Nov; 90(5):835-840.e1. PubMed ID: 31319060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocuff Vision Reduces Inspection Time Without Decreasing Lesion Detection: A Clinical Randomized Trial.
    Rex DK; Slaven JE; Garcia J; Lahr R; Searight M; Gross SA
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 18(1):158-162.e1. PubMed ID: 30659990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is associated with a lower adenoma miss rate: a multicenter randomized tandem study.
    Triantafyllou K; Polymeros D; Apostolopoulos P; Lopes Brandao C; Gkolfakis P; Repici A; Papanikolaou IS; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Alexandrakis G; Hassan C
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 28763808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.
    Bhattacharyya R; Chedgy F; Kandiah K; Fogg C; Higgins B; Haysom-Newport B; Gadeke L; Thursby-Pelham F; Ellis R; Goggin P; Longcroft-Wheaton G; Bhandari P
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28614895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved adenoma detection by a novel distal attachment device-assisted colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Hong SW; Hong HS; Kim K; Oh K; Lee JY; Park JH; Hwang SW; Park SH; Yang DH; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Byeon JS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Sep; 96(3):543-552.e1. PubMed ID: 35500658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).
    Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AmplifEYE assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: A randomized controlled study.
    Sze SF; Cheung WI; Wong WC; Hui YT; Lam JTW
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):376-382. PubMed ID: 33141979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center.
    Tsiamoulos ZP; Misra R; Rameshshanker R; Elliott TR; Beintaris I; Thomas-Gibson S; Haycock A; Suzuki N; Rees C; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):280-287. PubMed ID: 28412271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial.
    Zorzi M; Hassan C; Battagello J; Antonelli G; Pantalena M; Bulighin G; Alicante S; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Iacopini F; Luigiano C; Monica F; Arrigoni A; Germanà B; Valiante F; Mallardi B; Senore C; Grazzini G; Mantellini P;
    Endoscopy; 2022 Feb; 54(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 33524994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Triantafyllou K; Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Papanikolaou IS; Fuccio L; Hassan C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1158-1170. PubMed ID: 30863002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Rex DK; Repici A; Gross SA; Hassan C; Ponugoti PL; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Thygesen JC; Sullivan AW; Tippins WW; Main SA; Eckert GJ; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):335-344.e2. PubMed ID: 29530353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy for surveillance of serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Rivero-Sánchez L; López Vicente J; Hernandez Villalba L; Puig I; Arnau-Collell C; Moreno L; Díaz M; Rodriguez de Miguel C; Ocaña T; Moreira L; Cuatrecasas M; Carballal S; Sánchez A; Ortiz O; Llach J; Balaguer F; Pellisé M;
    Endoscopy; 2019 Jul; 51(7):637-645. PubMed ID: 31174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.
    Imaeda H; Yamaoka M; Ohgo H; Soma H; Ashitani K; Miyaguchi K; Tsuzuki Y; Hosoe N; Nakamoto H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1492-1496. PubMed ID: 31254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Higher adenoma detection rate with the endocuff: a randomized trial.
    González-Fernández C; García-Rangel D; Aguilar-Olivos NE; Barreto-Zúñiga R; Romano-Munive AF; Grajales-Figueroa G; Zamora-Nava LE; Téllez-Avila FI
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 28898920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    van Doorn SC; van der Vlugt M; Depla A; Wientjes CA; Mallant-Hent RC; Siersema PD; Tytgat K; Tuynman H; Kuiken SD; Houben G; Stokkers P; Moons L; Bossuyt P; Fockens P; Mundt MW; Dekker E
    Gut; 2017 Mar; 66(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 26674360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a new accessory to improve adenoma detection rate? Technical aspects and first clinical experiences.
    Lenze F; Beyna T; Lenz P; Heinzow HS; Hengst K; Ullerich H
    Endoscopy; 2014 Jul; 46(7):610-4. PubMed ID: 24824090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Kessler WR; Sagi SV; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Wo JM; Dewitt JM; McHenry L; Lahr RE; Searight MP; MacPhail M; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased Sessile Serrated Adenoma Detection Rate With Mechanical New Technology Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Verheyen E; Castaneda D; Gross SA; Popov V
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 55(4):335-342. PubMed ID: 32649444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
    De Palma GD; Giglio MC; Bruzzese D; Gennarelli N; Maione F; Siciliano S; Manzo B; Cassese G; Luglio G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.