151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31319160)
1. Evaluation of two aneuploidy screening tests for chorionic villus samples: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Wu T; Zhu Y; Hong L; Lin Q; Chen C; Yang J; Ye L; Huang W; Zeng Y
Mol Cell Probes; 2019 Aug; 46():101422. PubMed ID: 31319160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen in spontaneous abortion using various methods].
Lei Q; Wang Q; Zhou CQ; Chen BJ; Chen Z; Xu YW; Zeng YH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 19570460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) for Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies.
Schouten J; van Vught P; Galjaard RJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():161-170. PubMed ID: 30506197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selective growth of mosaic cells in chromosomal analysis of chorionic villi by conventional karyotyping.
Zhang Y; Lei Q; Liu J; Lin M; Luo L; Li T; Wang Q; Zhou C
Mol Cell Probes; 2020 Jun; 51():101532. PubMed ID: 32081770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aneuploidy screening in direct chorionic villus samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation: the use of commercial probes in a clinical setting.
Quilter CR; Holman S; AL-Hammadi RM; Theodorides D; Hastings RJ; Delhanty JD
BJOG; 2001 Feb; 108(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 11236123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-trimester spontaneous pregnancy loss - molecular analysis using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Zimowski JG; Massalska D; Pawelec M; Bijok J; Michałowska A; Roszkowski T
Clin Genet; 2016 May; 89(5):620-4. PubMed ID: 26748861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.
Van Opstal D; Boter M; de Jong D; van den Berg C; Brüggenwirth HT; Wildschut HI; de Klein A; Galjaard RJ
Eur J Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 17(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 18781187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular analysis of miscarriage products using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): alternative to conventional karyotype analysis.
Kim JW; Lyu SW; Sung SR; Park JE; Cha DH; Yoon TK; Ko JJ; Shim SH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Feb; 291(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 25115280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility and limitations of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique in the detection of cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception.
Saxena D; Agarwal M; Gupta D; Agrawal S; Das V; Phadke SR
J Postgrad Med; 2016; 62(4):239-241. PubMed ID: 27763481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y.
Gerdes T; Kirchhoff M; Lind AM; Vestergaard Larsen G; Kjaergaard S
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1119-25. PubMed ID: 19003800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effectiveness of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies].
Jóźwiak A; Bijok J; Massalska D; Pawłowska B; Ilnicka A; Bogdanowicz J; Masternak-Wasiuk K; Jakiel G; Roszkowski T
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):682-90. PubMed ID: 24191501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Kooper AJA; Faas BHW; Feuth T; Creemers JWT; Zondervan HH; Boekkooi PF; Quartero RWP; Rijnders RJP; van der Burgt I; van Kessel AG; Smits APT
J Mol Diagn; 2009 Jan; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19074591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Future of prenatal cytogenetic studies: rapid aneuploidy testing or full karyotype].
Bocian E
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):881-7. PubMed ID: 18306922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).
Hochstenbach R; Meijer J; van de Brug J; Vossebeld-Hoff I; Jansen R; van der Luijt RB; Sinke RJ; Page-Christiaens GC; Ploos van Amstel JK; de Pater JM
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Nov; 25(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 16231311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid detection of aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by subtelomeric multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
Wang J; Liu Z; Liu H; Li N; Li S; Chen X; Lin Y; Wang H; Zhu J; Liu S
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2013; 34(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 23774328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of cryptic subtelomeric chromosome abnormalities and identification of anonymous chromatin using a quantitative multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay.
Northrop EL; Ren H; Bruno DL; McGhie JD; Coffa J; Schouten J; Choo KH; Slater HR
Hum Mutat; 2005 Nov; 26(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 16170807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subtelomeric multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as a supplement for rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aberrations.
Chen X; Li H; Mao Y; Xu X; Lv J; Zhou L; Lin X; Tang S
Mol Cytogenet; 2014; 7(1):96. PubMed ID: 25506396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment.
Caine A; Maltby AE; Parkin CA; Waters JJ; Crolla JA;
Lancet; 2005 Jul 9-15; 366(9480):123-8. PubMed ID: 16005334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in fetal blood and chorionic villi by fluorescence in situ hybridisation.
Pandya PP; Kuhn P; Brizot M; Cardy DL; Nicolaides KH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jun; 101(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 8018636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
