312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31319940)
1. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.
Heidari M; Khuzani AZ; Hollingsworth AB; Danala G; Mirniaharikandehei S; Qiu Y; Liu H; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035020. PubMed ID: 29239858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Conant EF; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 29395798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.
Häberle L; Hack CC; Heusinger K; Wagner F; Jud SM; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T; Fasching PA
Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 28854966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.
Chen X; Zargari A; Hollingsworth AB; Liu H; Zheng B; Qiu Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104995. PubMed ID: 31443864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms: a quantitative assessment.
Tan M; Al-Shabi M; Chan WY; Thomas L; Rahmat K; Ng KH
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 33447988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast lesion classification using GLGLM and shape features: Combined-view and multi-classifiers.
Liang C; Bian Z; Lv W; Chen S; Zeng D; Ma J
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():61-72. PubMed ID: 30471821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
