These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31319944)

  • 21. The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for better selection for embryo transfer.
    Kovačič B; Hojnik N; Vlaisavljević V
    J Stem Cells; 2014; 9(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 25158088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study.
    Storr A; Venetis C; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):276-283.e3. PubMed ID: 29331237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting pregnancy rate following multiple embryo transfers using algorithms developed through static image analysis.
    Tian Y; Wang W; Yin Y; Wang W; Duan F; Zhao S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 May; 34(5):473-479. PubMed ID: 28236600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope.
    Rubio I; Galán A; Larreategui Z; Ayerdi F; Bellver J; Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1287-1294.e5. PubMed ID: 25217875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
    Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model.
    Cruz M; Garrido N; Gadea B; Muñoz M; Pérez-Cano I; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23953584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Morphokinetic analysis of human embryo development and its relationship to the female age: a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.
    Akhter N; Shahab M
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2017 Aug; 63(8):84-92. PubMed ID: 28886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: State of the technology and future directions.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Romany L; Meseguer M
    Birth Defects Res; 2018 May; 110(8):648-653. PubMed ID: 29714056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a new clinically applicable device for embryo evaluation which measures embryo oxygen consumption.
    Kurosawa H; Utsunomiya H; Shiga N; Takahashi A; Ihara M; Ishibashi M; Nishimoto M; Watanabe Z; Abe H; Kumagai J; Terada Y; Igarashi H; Takahashi T; Fukui A; Suganuma R; Tachibana M; Yaegashi N
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 27609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time-lapse imaging algorithms rank human preimplantation embryos according to the probability of live birth.
    Fishel S; Campbell A; Montgomery S; Smith R; Nice L; Duffy S; Jenner L; Berrisford K; Kellam L; Smith R; Foad F; Beccles A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Sep; 37(3):304-313. PubMed ID: 30314885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study.
    Kieslinger DC; De Gheselle S; Lambalk CB; De Sutter P; Kostelijk EH; Twisk JW; van Rijswijk J; Van den Abbeel E; Vergouw CG
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2450-2457. PubMed ID: 27619774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
    Kirkegaard K; Sundvall L; Erlandsen M; Hindkjær JJ; Knudsen UB; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.
    Barrie A; Homburg R; McDowell G; Brown J; Kingsland C; Troup S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 28069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time-lapse monitoring of zona pellucida-free embryos obtained through in vitro fertilization: a retrospective case series.
    Bodri D; Kato R; Kondo M; Hosomi N; Katsumata Y; Kawachiya S; Matsumoto T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):e35. PubMed ID: 25772774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study.
    Kovacs P; Matyas S; Forgacs V; Sajgo A; Molnar L; Pribenszky C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():58-63. PubMed ID: 30580224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Review of computer vision application in in vitro fertilization: the application of deep learning-based computer vision technology in the world of IVF.
    Louis CM; Erwin A; Handayani N; Polim AA; Boediono A; Sini I
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1627-1639. PubMed ID: 33811587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth.
    Liu Y; Chapple V; Feenan K; Roberts P; Matson P
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):656-662.e1. PubMed ID: 26616439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring.
    Kovacs P
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Dec; 12():124. PubMed ID: 25510244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs.
    Borna MR; Sepehri MM; Maleki B
    Front Artif Intell; 2024; 7():1375474. PubMed ID: 38881952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Co-trained convolutional neural networks for automated detection of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI.
    Yang X; Liu C; Wang Z; Yang J; Min HL; Wang L; Cheng KT
    Med Image Anal; 2017 Dec; 42():212-227. PubMed ID: 28850876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.