BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31320249)

  • 1. Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability.
    Merchut-Maya JM; Bartek J; Maya-Mendoza A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102654. PubMed ID: 31320249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.
    Maya-Mendoza A; Moudry P; Merchut-Maya JM; Lee M; Strauss R; Bartek J
    Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7713):279-284. PubMed ID: 29950726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proteolytic control of genome integrity at the replication fork.
    Rageul J; Weinheimer AS; Park JJ; Kim H
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102657. PubMed ID: 31324531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway.
    Ait Saada A; Lambert SAE; Carr AM
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Nov; 71():135-147. PubMed ID: 30220600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.
    Alexander JL; Orr-Weaver TL
    Genes Dev; 2016 Oct; 30(20):2241-2252. PubMed ID: 27898391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
    Cortez D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():149-157. PubMed ID: 25957489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
    Jones RM; Petermann E
    Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
    Tourrière H; Pasero P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ubiquitylation at Stressed Replication Forks: Mechanisms and Functions.
    Mirsanaye AS; Typas D; Mailand N
    Trends Cell Biol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):584-597. PubMed ID: 33612353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.
    Joseph SA; Taglialatela A; Leuzzi G; Huang JW; Cuella-Martin R; Ciccia A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2020 Nov; 95():102943. PubMed ID: 32971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.
    Patel DR; Weiss RS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Dec; 46(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30514768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repair and tolerance of DNA damage at the replication fork: A structural perspective.
    Eichman BF
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2023 Aug; 81():102618. PubMed ID: 37269798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of ubiquitination and the maintenance of replication fork stability in cancer therapy.
    Xia D; Zhu X; Wang Y; Gong P; Su HS; Xu X
    Biosci Rep; 2023 Oct; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 37728310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.
    Atkinson J; McGlynn P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jun; 37(11):3475-92. PubMed ID: 19406929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
    Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2010 Mar; 11(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 20177396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of specialized DNA polymerases in the limitation of replicative stress and DNA damage transmission.
    Bournique E; Dall'Osto M; Hoffmann JS; Bergoglio V
    Mutat Res; 2018 Mar; 808():62-73. PubMed ID: 28843435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromatin immunoprecipitation to detect DNA replication and repair factors.
    Gadaleta MC; Iwasaki O; Noguchi C; Noma K; Noguchi E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1300():169-86. PubMed ID: 25916713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.
    Nickoloff JA; Jaiswal AS; Sharma N; Williamson EA; Tran MT; Arris D; Yang M; Hromas R
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Nov; 24(23):. PubMed ID: 38069223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolism of DNA secondary structures at the eukaryotic replication fork.
    León-Ortiz AM; Svendsen J; Boulton SJ
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2014 Jul; 19():152-62. PubMed ID: 24815912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.