202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31321298)
1. Agreement in Histological Assessment of Mitotic Activity Between Microscopy and Digital Whole Slide Images Informs Conversion for Clinical Diagnosis.
Wei BR; Halsey CH; Hoover SB; Puri M; Yang HH; Gallas BD; Lee MP; Chen W; Durham AC; Dwyer JE; Sánchez MD; Traslavina RP; Frank C; Bradley C; McGill LD; Esplin DG; Schaffer PA; Cramer SD; Lyle LT; Beck J; Buza E; Gong Q; Hewitt SM; Simpson RM
Acad Pathol; 2019; 6():2374289519859841. PubMed ID: 31321298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Computational Detection, Quantitation, and Mapping of Mitosis in Whole-Slide Images for Clinically Actionable Surgical Pathology Decision Support.
Puri M; Hoover SB; Hewitt SM; Wei BR; Adissu HA; Halsey CHC; Beck J; Bradley C; Cramer SD; Durham AC; Esplin DG; Frank C; Lyle LT; McGill LD; Sánchez MD; Schaffer PA; Traslavina RP; Buza E; Yang HH; Lee MP; Dwyer JE; Simpson RM
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():4. PubMed ID: 30915258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.
Kent MN; Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Tesno KC; Moad JC; Conroy MP; Kendrick MJ; Stephenson SR; Murchland MR; Khan AU; Peacock EA; Brumfiel A; Bottomley MA
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 153(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 29049424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of mitotic cell quantification via microscopy and multiple whole-slide scanners.
Tabata K; Uraoka N; Benhamida J; Hanna MG; Sirintrapun SJ; Gallas BD; Gong Q; Aly RG; Emoto K; Matsuda KM; Hameed MR; Klimstra DS; Yagi Y
Diagn Pathol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 31238983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.
Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Cronin AM; Al-Ahmadie HA; Gopalan A; Tickoo SK; Reuter VE; Fine SW
Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20970164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual assessment of mitotic figures in breast cancer: a comparative study between light microscopy and whole slide images.
Lashen A; Ibrahim A; Katayama A; Ball G; Mihai R; Toss M; Rakha E
Histopathology; 2021 Dec; 79(6):913-925. PubMed ID: 34455620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evaluation of colon biopsies using virtual microscopy is reliable.
van der Post RS; van der Laak JA; Sturm B; Clarijs R; Schaafsma HE; van Krieken JH; Nap M
Histopathology; 2013 Jul; 63(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 23692065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 1000 Mitoses Project: A Consensus-Based International Collaborative Study on Mitotic Figures Classification.
Lin S; Tran C; Bandari E; Romagnoli T; Li Y; Chu M; Amirthakatesan AS; Dallmann A; Kostiukov A; Panizo A; Hodgson A; Laury AR; Polonia A; Stueck AE; Menon AA; Morini A; Özamrak B; Cooper C; Trinidad CMG; Eisenlöffel C; Suleiman DE; Suster D; Dorward DA; Aljufairi EA; Maclean F; Gul G; Sansano I; Erana-Rojas IE; Machado I; Kholova I; Karunanithi J; Gibier JB; Schulte JJ; Li JJX; Kini JR; Collins K; Galea LA; Muller L; Cima L; Nova-Camacho LM; Dabner M; Muscara MJ; Hanna MG; Agoumi M; Wiebe NJP; Oswald NK; Zahra N; Folaranmi OO; Kravtsov O; Semerci O; Patil NN; Muthusamy Sundar P; Charles P; Kumaraswamy Rajeswaran P; Zhang Q; van der Griend R; Pillappa R; Perret R; Gonzalez RS; Reed RC; Patil S; Jiang XS; Qayoom S; Prendeville S; Baskota SU; Tran TT; San TH; Kukkonen TM; Kendall TJ; Taskin T; Rutland T; Manucha V; Cockenpot V; Rosen Y; Rodriguez-Velandia YP; Ordulu Z; Cecchini MJ
Int J Surg Pathol; 2024 Apr; ():10668969241234321. PubMed ID: 38627896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Digital Microscopy Compared With Light Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Canine Cutaneous Tumors.
Bertram CA; Gurtner C; Dettwiler M; Kershaw O; Dietert K; Pieper L; Pischon H; Gruber AD; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2018 Jul; 55(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 29402206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses.
Pantanowitz L; Hartman D; Qi Y; Cho EY; Suh B; Paeng K; Dhir R; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Song SY; Cho SY
Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 32622359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of mitotic activity index in breast cancer using whole slide digital images.
Al-Janabi S; van Slooten HJ; Visser M; van der Ploeg T; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82576. PubMed ID: 24386102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital reporting of whole-slide images is safe and suitable for assessing organ quality in preimplantation renal biopsies.
Eccher A; Neil D; Ciangherotti A; Cima L; Boschiero L; Martignoni G; Ghimenton C; Chilosi M; Giobelli L; Zampicinini L; Casartelli M; Brunelli M
Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26547252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitosis detection in breast cancer histological images An ICPR 2012 contest.
Roux L; Racoceanu D; Loménie N; Kulikova M; Irshad H; Klossa J; Capron F; Genestie C; Le Naour G; Gurcan MN
J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():8. PubMed ID: 23858383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.
Davidson TM; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Onega T; Allison KH; Mercan E; Brunyé TT; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():11. PubMed ID: 31057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital slide images for primary diagnostics in breast pathology: a feasibility study.
Al-Janabi S; Huisman A; Willems SM; Van Diest PJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Dec; 43(12):2318-25. PubMed ID: 22901465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mitotic Figures-Normal, Atypical, and Imposters: A Guide to Identification.
Donovan TA; Moore FM; Bertram CA; Luong R; Bolfa P; Klopfleisch R; Tvedten H; Salas EN; Whitley DB; Aubreville M; Meuten DJ
Vet Pathol; 2021 Mar; 58(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 33371818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
