These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31321536)
1. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial. Dunstan M; Smith R; Schwab K; Scala A; Gatenby P; Whyte M; Rockall T; Jourdan I Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31321536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study. Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study. Parshad R; Nanjakla Jayappa S; Bhattacharjee HK; Suhani S; Joshi MK; Bhoi D; Kashyap L Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 33638108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Schwab KE; Curtis NJ; Whyte MB; Smith RV; Rockall TA; Ballard K; Jourdan IC Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1745-1753. PubMed ID: 31312963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial. Thomaschewski M; Jürgens T; Keck T; Laubert T; Benecke C Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 33530845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial. Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application Value of 4K High-Definition System in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Preliminary Results and Initial Experience. Zhang L; Hong H; Zang L; Dong F; Lu A; Feng B; He Z; Xue P; Cai Z; Zheng M; Ma J J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Feb; 32(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 33970027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant? Currò G; La Malfa G; Lazzara S; Caizzone A; Fortugno A; Navarra G J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):566-70. PubMed ID: 26076180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial. Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D visualization systems improve operator efficiency during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective blinded review of surgical videos. Patel M; Tranter-Entwistle I; Sirimanna P; Hugh TJ ANZ J Surg; 2024 Jun; 94(6):1114-1121. PubMed ID: 38486432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A case-control study. Agrusa A; di Buono G; Chianetta D; Sorce V; Citarrella R; Galia M; Vernuccio L; Romano G; Gulotta G Int J Surg; 2016 Apr; 28 Suppl 1():S114-7. PubMed ID: 26708842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Koppatz H; Harju J; Sirén J; Mentula P; Scheinin T; Sallinen V Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3725-3731. PubMed ID: 30710315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems. Kinoshita H; Nakagawa K; Usui Y; Iwamura M; Ito A; Miyajima A; Hoshi A; Arai Y; Baba S; Matsuda T Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2203-9. PubMed ID: 25361650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D Vision Provides Shorter Operative Time and More Accurate Intraoperative Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair Compared With 2D Vision. Leon P; Rivellini R; Giudici F; Sciuto A; Pirozzi F; Corcione F Surg Innov; 2017 Apr; 24(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 28118788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study. Usta TA; Ozkaynak A; Kovalak E; Ergul E; Naki MM; Kaya E Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25414065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study. Zwimpfer TA; Wismer C; Fellmann-Fischer B; Geiger J; Schötzau A; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 34699034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]