180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31321536)
1. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial.
Dunstan M; Smith R; Schwab K; Scala A; Gatenby P; Whyte M; Rockall T; Jourdan I
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31321536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.
Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study.
Parshad R; Nanjakla Jayappa S; Bhattacharjee HK; Suhani S; Joshi MK; Bhoi D; Kashyap L
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 33638108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Schwab KE; Curtis NJ; Whyte MB; Smith RV; Rockall TA; Ballard K; Jourdan IC
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1745-1753. PubMed ID: 31312963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Thomaschewski M; Jürgens T; Keck T; Laubert T; Benecke C
Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 33530845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application Value of 4K High-Definition System in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Preliminary Results and Initial Experience.
Zhang L; Hong H; Zang L; Dong F; Lu A; Feng B; He Z; Xue P; Cai Z; Zheng M; Ma J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Feb; 32(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 33970027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant?
Currò G; La Malfa G; Lazzara S; Caizzone A; Fortugno A; Navarra G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):566-70. PubMed ID: 26076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.
Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Koppatz HE; Harju JI; Sirén JE; Mentula PJ; Scheinin TM; Sallinen VJ
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4857-4865. PubMed ID: 31754852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial.
Kanaji S; Watanabe R; Mascagni P; Trauzettel F; Urade T; Longo F; Guerriero L; Perretta S; Dallemagne B; Kakeji Y; Marescaux J
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5083-5091. PubMed ID: 31811456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A case-control study.
Agrusa A; di Buono G; Chianetta D; Sorce V; Citarrella R; Galia M; Vernuccio L; Romano G; Gulotta G
Int J Surg; 2016 Apr; 28 Suppl 1():S114-7. PubMed ID: 26708842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Koppatz H; Harju J; Sirén J; Mentula P; Scheinin T; Sallinen V
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3725-3731. PubMed ID: 30710315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems.
Kinoshita H; Nakagawa K; Usui Y; Iwamura M; Ito A; Miyajima A; Hoshi A; Arai Y; Baba S; Matsuda T
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2203-9. PubMed ID: 25361650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D Vision Provides Shorter Operative Time and More Accurate Intraoperative Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair Compared With 2D Vision.
Leon P; Rivellini R; Giudici F; Sciuto A; Pirozzi F; Corcione F
Surg Innov; 2017 Apr; 24(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 28118788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.
Usta TA; Ozkaynak A; Kovalak E; Ergul E; Naki MM; Kaya E
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25414065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.
Zwimpfer TA; Wismer C; Fellmann-Fischer B; Geiger J; Schötzau A; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 34699034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
van den Bos J; Schols RM; Luyer MD; van Dam RM; Vahrmeijer AL; Meijerink WJ; Gobardhan PD; van Dam GM; Bouvy ND; Stassen LP
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011668. PubMed ID: 27566635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
