162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31321627)
1. Optimal b-values for diffusion kurtosis imaging in invasive ductal carcinoma versus ductal carcinoma in situ breast lesions.
Borlinhas F; Conceição RC; Ferreira HA
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):871-885. PubMed ID: 31321627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of breast lesions using diffusion kurtosis model-based imaging: An initial experience.
Zhou WP; Zan XY; Hu XY; Liu X; Sudarshan SKP; Yang SD; Guo YJ; Fang XM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):157-169. PubMed ID: 31815728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.
Park VY; Kim SG; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():199-208. PubMed ID: 31323316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
Kim KW; Kuzmiak CM; Kim YJ; Seo JY; Jung HK; Lee MS
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 29339079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters in diffusion-weighted MRI: Associations with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Kang YJ; Yoo H; Yoo J; Lee J; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1394-1406. PubMed ID: 27796081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
Ding JR; Wang DN; Pan JL
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):744-50. PubMed ID: 27461644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging in characterization of breast lesions.
Christou A; Ghiatas A; Priovolos D; Veliou K; Bougias H
Br J Radiol; 2017 May; 90(1073):20160873. PubMed ID: 28383279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.
Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Loureiro J; Ferreira HA; Ramos I
Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20130807. PubMed ID: 24834475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 22517955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of breast tumors using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI).
Wu D; Li G; Zhang J; Chang S; Hu J; Dai Y
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113240. PubMed ID: 25406010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma
Shi J; Chen L; Wang B; Zhang H; Xu L; Ye J; Liu Y; Shao Y; Sun X; Zou Y
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 35899956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
