These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31321677)
21. Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors. El-Nahas AR; Taha DE; Elsaadany MM; Zahran MH; Hassan M; Sheir KZ Urolithiasis; 2018 Jun; 46(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 28555349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do JJ Stents Increase the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones? Gündüz M; Sekmenli T; Ciftci İ; Elmacı AM Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):425-428. PubMed ID: 27780167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Daily Resistive Index measurement useful tool in the estimation of the optimal time interval between two Shock Wave Lithotripsy sessions. Yencilek E; Sarsılmaz A; Kilickesmez O; Koyuncu H; Eryildirim B; Gurses B; Bastug Y; Erihan B Med Ultrason; 2015 Jun; 17(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 26052567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones. Kaygısız O; Kılıçarslan H; Mert A; Coşkun B; Kordan Y Urolithiasis; 2018 Aug; 46(4):391-395. PubMed ID: 28756458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones. Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ungated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: safe and effective in the pediatric population. Palmer JS Can J Urol; 2009 Dec; 16(6):4924-6. PubMed ID: 20003670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the impact of shock wave lithotripsy on kidneys using a new marker: how do neutrophil gelatinese-associated lypocalin values change after shock wave lithotripsy? Zekey F; Senkul T; Ates F; Soydan H; Yilmaz O; Baykal K Urology; 2012 Aug; 80(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 22503759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. Ozgor F; Tosun M; Kayali Y; Savun M; Binbay M; Tepeler A J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 27889982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children. Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Chiong E; Hwee ST; Kay LM; Liang S; Kamaraj R; Esuvaranathan K Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 15922429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Pilot Study to Evaluate Haemostatic Function, following Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for the Treatment of Solitary Kidney Stones. Hughes SF; Thomas-Wright SJ; Banwell J; Williams R; Moyes AJ; Mushtaq S; Abdulmajed M; Shergill I PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125840. PubMed ID: 25938233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study. Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy. Mustafa M; Pancaroglu K Urol Res; 2011 Jun; 39(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 21063696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of renal cortical thickness on the treatment outcomes of kidney stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy. Ng CF; Luke S; Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Wong KT; Hou SS Korean J Urol; 2015 May; 56(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 25964839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Elkoushy MA; Hassan JA; Morehouse DD; Anidjar M; Andonian S Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 21550641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of inclined position on stone free rates in patients with lower caliceal stones during SWL session. Cakiroglu B; Sinanoglu O; Tas T; Hazar IA; Balci MB Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2015 Mar; 87(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 25847895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Honey RJ; Ray AA; Ghiculete D; ; Pace KT Urology; 2010 Jan; 75(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 19896176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]