These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3132182)

  • 1. Case mix measures: DRGs and alternatives.
    Vladeck BC; Kramer PS
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1988; 9():333-59. PubMed ID: 3132182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myths and maths of DRGs.
    Bradford CK
    Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(3):72-7. PubMed ID: 3920789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving cost control in the hospital outpatient department.
    Sulvetta MB
    Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl; 1991; ():95-106. PubMed ID: 10170944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It was 20 years ago today ... some say it's complex and vulnerable to political whims, but Medicare's PPS has helped impose order on hospital finances.
    Tieman J
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Sep; 33(39):6-7, 25-8, 1. PubMed ID: 14571566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TEFRA: impact on hospitals, nurses, physicians and patients.
    Brandon JA
    Health Care Superv; 1985 Apr; 3(3):78-85. PubMed ID: 10311009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resource utilization groups. DRGs move to long-term care.
    Mitty EL
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):539-57. PubMed ID: 3138670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Texas Medicaid prospective payment system detailed.
    Hillier RK; Kreiter D
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Oct; 42(5):22-6, 36, 42. PubMed ID: 10311763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to implement a case-mix system in less than a year.
    Lambowitz S
    Manag Care Q; 1999; 7(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 10350800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The resource utilization group system: its effect on nursing home case mix and costs.
    Thorpe KE; Gertler PJ; Goldman P
    Inquiry; 1991; 28(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 1761308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital responses to Medicare's Prospective Payment System.
    Zuckerman S; Feder J; Hadley J
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1988; 64(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 3072037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2013 rates; hospitals' resident caps for graduate medical education payment purposes; quality reporting requirements for specific providers and for ambulatory surgical centers. final rule.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2012 Aug; 77(170):53257-750. PubMed ID: 22937544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A foundation for hospital case mix measurement.
    Wood WR; Ament RP; Kobrinski EJ
    Inquiry; 1981; 18(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 6456992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A workbook approach to justifying I.V. therapy teams under prospective payment.
    Burik D; Cramton CW; Holtz JM
    NITA; 1984; 7(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 6435040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and Fiscal Year 2014 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; hospital conditions of participation; payment policies related to patient status. Final rules.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2013 Aug; 78(160):50495-1040. PubMed ID: 23977713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients.
    Shaughnessy PW; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Polesovsky MB
    Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 3159672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DRGs are not the answer.
    Zenty TF
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(6):134-42. PubMed ID: 10311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Provisions of the Balanced Budget Act challenge IDS care coordination patterns.
    Rovinsky M
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Aug; 53(8):31-4. PubMed ID: 10557797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case-mix payment rates reflect resident needs.
    Deane R
    Provider; 1992 Apr; 18(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 10117301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The promise and potential of case-mix payment systems.
    Grimaldi PL
    Provider; 1990 Feb; 16(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 10113108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.