These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31322594)
1. [Effect of dental implants with conditioned surface based on sodium hydroxide in patients with osteoporosis]. Kozlova MV; Mkrtumyan AM; Bazikyan EA; Belyakova AS; Dzikovitskaya LS Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(3):46-51. PubMed ID: 31322594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Features of restoration of chewing efficiency in patients over 50 years with complete absence of teeth and alveolar bone atrophy.]. Kozlova MV; Mkrtumyan AM; Belyakova AS; Dzikovitskaya LS Adv Gerontol; 2019; 32(1-2):218-226. PubMed ID: 31228394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fixation of expandable implants in the mandibles of ovariectomized sheep. Xiao JR; Li DH; Chen YX; Chen SJ; Guan SM; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 23298803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo evaluation of biofunctionalized implant surfaces with a synthetic peptide (P-15) and its impact on osseointegration. A preclinical animal study. Schmitt CM; Koepple M; Moest T; Neumann K; Weisel T; Schlegel KA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 26567087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of surface contamination on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects. Mohamed S; Polyzois I; Renvert S; Claffey N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 20443803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study--machined versus titanium oxide implant surface. Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Scapoli C; Scotti R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17340895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the implantation in the lateral part of the mandible between short tissue level (TE) and bone level (BL) implant systems. Hadzik J; Botzenhart U; Krawiec M; Gedrange T; Heinemann F; Vegh A; Dominiak M Ann Anat; 2017 Sep; 213():78-82. PubMed ID: 28602825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5-year prospective study. Mertens C; Steveling HG Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1354-60. PubMed ID: 21382092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface conditioning with cold argon plasma and its effect on the osseointegration of dental implants in miniature pigs. Naujokat H; Harder S; Schulz LY; Wiltfang J; Flörke C; Açil Y J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):484-490. PubMed ID: 30661927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible. Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study. Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel Experimental Dental Implant Permits Quantitative Grading of Surface-Property Effects on Osseointegration. Hunziker EB; Spiegl-Habegger M; Rudolf S; Liu Y; Gu Z; Lippuner K; Shintani N; Enggist L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):967-978. PubMed ID: 30231082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis. Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 36-month randomized controlled split-mouth trial comparing immediately loaded titanium oxide-anodized and machined implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible. Fung K; Marzola R; Scotti R; Tadinada A; Schincaglia GP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):631-8. PubMed ID: 21691611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does vitamin D have an effect on osseointegration of dental implants? A systematic review. Werny JG; Sagheb K; Diaz L; Kämmerer PW; Al-Nawas B; Schiegnitz E Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Apr; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 35403929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]