These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31322913)

  • 1. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
    Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of lymphoma nodal target lesions: Comparison of PET standardized uptake value (SUV) with MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
    Bernstine H; Domachevsky L; Nidam M; Goldberg N; Abadi-Korek I; Shpilberg O; Groshar D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0490. PubMed ID: 29668631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): a pilot study on the assessment of treatment response in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Schmidt S; Dunet V; Koehli M; Montemurro M; Meuli R; Prior JO
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 23761549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
    Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
    Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
    Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a connection between immunohistochemical markers and grading of lung cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardised uptake values (SUV) of hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI?
    Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Ullrich T; Ingenwerth M; Bogner S; Eze C; Nensa F; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Sawicki LM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Dec; 64(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 32705779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between DW-MRI and
    Connor S; Sit C; Anjari M; Szyszko T; Dunn J; Pai I; Cook G; Goh V
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1360. PubMed ID: 33960739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
    Brandmaier P; Purz S; Bremicker K; Höckel M; Barthel H; Kluge R; Kahn T; Sabri O; Stumpp P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141684. PubMed ID: 26551527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the SUVmax of FDG-PET/CT Correlate with the ADC Values of DWI in Musculoskeletal Malignancies?
    Ozturk M; Polat AV; Tosun FC; Selcuk MB
    J Belg Soc Radiol; 2021 Feb; 105(1):11. PubMed ID: 33665542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
    Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between glycolytic activity on [18F]-FDG-PET and cell density on diffusion-weighted MRI in lymphoma at staging.
    Giraudo C; Karanikas G; Weber M; Raderer M; Jaeger U; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1217-1226. PubMed ID: 29086453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Morawitz J; Kirchner J; Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Dietzel F; Li Y; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Bittner AK; Mohrmann S; Ingenwerth M; Häberle L; Esposito I; Antoch G; Buchbender C; Sawicki LM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 46(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 33351505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV.
    Varoquaux A; Rager O; Lovblad KO; Masterson K; Dulguerov P; Ratib O; Becker CD; Becker M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jun; 40(6):842-52. PubMed ID: 23436068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) with overall survival in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using
    Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Grueneisen J; Li Y; McCutcheon A; Aigner C; Rischpler C; Sawicki LM; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Schaarschmidt BM
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109422. PubMed ID: 33271432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiparametric voxel-based analyses of standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficients of soft-tissue tumours with a positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance system: Preliminary results.
    Sagiyama K; Watanabe Y; Kamei R; Hong S; Kawanami S; Matsumoto Y; Honda H
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5024-5033. PubMed ID: 28639049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone Marrow Involvement in Malignant Lymphoma: Evaluation of Quantitative PET and MRI Biomarkers.
    Asenbaum U; Nolz R; Karanikas G; Furtner J; Woitek R; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Raderer M; Mayerhoefer ME
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 29199055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.