219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31323242)
1. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
Kaplan E; Jesse A
Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.
Grossman RB; Steinhart E; Mitchell T; McIlvane W
Autism Res; 2015 Jun; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 25620208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Congruent Visual Speech Enhances Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Auditory Speech in Noise-Free Conditions.
Crosse MJ; Butler JS; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(42):14195-204. PubMed ID: 26490860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
Jiang X; Pell MD
Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Competing influence of visual speech on auditory neural adaptation.
Sato M
Brain Lang; 2023 Dec; 247():105359. PubMed ID: 37951157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the speaker's eye gaze facilitate infants' word segmentation from continuous speech? An ERP study.
Çetinçelik M; Rowland CF; Snijders TM
Dev Sci; 2024 Mar; 27(2):e13436. PubMed ID: 37551932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech.
Bowers AL; Crawcour SC; Saltuklaroglu T; Kalinowski J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2010; 45(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 22748027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye Gaze and Perceptual Adaptation to Audiovisual Degraded Speech.
Banks B; Gowen E; Munro KJ; Adank P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3432-3445. PubMed ID: 34463528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing audiovisual speech integration in autism through enhanced attention to mouth.
Feng S; Wang Q; Hu Y; Lu H; Li T; Song C; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13348. PubMed ID: 36394129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speaker identity supports phonetic category learning.
Mani N; Schneider S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 23148468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Left Motor δ Oscillations Reflect Asynchrony Detection in Multisensory Speech Perception.
Biau E; Schultz BG; Gunter TC; Kotz SA
J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 42(11):2313-2326. PubMed ID: 35086905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of when, what and how predictions on auditory speech perception.
Pinto S; Tremblay P; Basirat A; Sato M
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3143-3153. PubMed ID: 31576421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Slowing down the flow of facial information enhances facial scanning in children with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot eye tracking study].
Charrier A; Tardif C; Gepner B
Encephale; 2017 Feb; 43(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 26995150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crossmodal Phase Reset and Evoked Responses Provide Complementary Mechanisms for the Influence of Visual Speech in Auditory Cortex.
Mégevand P; Mercier MR; Groppe DM; Zion Golumbic E; Mesgarani N; Beauchamp MS; Schroeder CE; Mehta AD
J Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 40(44):8530-8542. PubMed ID: 33023923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
