These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31323377)

  • 1. The effects of high variability training on voice identity learning.
    Lavan N; Knight S; Hazan V; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104026. PubMed ID: 31323377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.
    Lavan N; Burston LF; Ladwa P; Merriman SE; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 30808271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listeners form average-based representations of individual voice identities.
    Lavan N; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2404. PubMed ID: 31160558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?
    Lavan N; Mileva M; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 32445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faces and voices in the brain: A modality-general person-identity representation in superior temporal sulcus.
    Tsantani M; Kriegeskorte N; McGettigan C; Garrido L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116004. PubMed ID: 31299368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An identity-irrelevant discrimination task reveals familiarity-advantage in face perception and no self-advantage in voice perception.
    Harada T; Kamachi MG; Yotsumoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Jul; 247():104317. PubMed ID: 38743984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sorting through the impact of familiarity when processing vocal identity: Results from a voice sorting task.
    Stevenage SV; Symons AE; Fletcher A; Coen C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):519-536. PubMed ID: 31658884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activation in the angular gyrus and in the pSTS is modulated by face primes during voice recognition.
    Hölig C; Föcker J; Best A; Röder B; Büchel C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 May; 38(5):2553-2565. PubMed ID: 28218433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Burston LFK; Garrido L
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 30221374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus repetition and training schedule on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its transfer.
    Banai K; Lavner Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2944-2955. PubMed ID: 31161493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.
    Zäske R; Volberg G; Kovács G; Schweinberger SR
    J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(33):10821-31. PubMed ID: 25122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Please sort these voice recordings into 2 identities': Effects of task instructions on performance in voice sorting studies.
    Lavan N; Merriman SE; Ladwa P; Burston LFK; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 111(3):556-569. PubMed ID: 31328792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible voices: Identity perception from variable vocal signals.
    Lavan N; Burton AM; Scott SK; McGettigan C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 29943171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short and long-term visual deprivation leads to adapted use of audiovisual information for face-voice recognition.
    Moro SS; Hoover AEN; Steeves JKE
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():274-281. PubMed ID: 29567099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance.
    Aglieri V; Chaminade T; Takerkart S; Belin P
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():356-365. PubMed ID: 30099078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.
    Aruffo C; Shore DI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22033983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus uncertainty and perceptual learning: similar principles govern auditory and visual learning.
    Nahum M; Nelken I; Ahissar M
    Vision Res; 2010 Feb; 50(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19761787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching voice and face identity from static images.
    Mavica LW; Barenholtz E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23276114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.