244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31324124)
1. Research misconduct, NSF v NIH: Its nature and prevalence and the impact of their respective methods of investigation and adjudication.
Kornfeld DS
Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 31324124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.
Loikith L; Bauchwitz R
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
Reynolds SM
Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
Pascal CB
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.
Kornfeld DS
Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
Pascal CB
Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.
Stern AM; Casadevall A; Steen RG; Fang FC
Elife; 2014 Aug; 3():e02956. PubMed ID: 25124673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Life After Research Misconduct.
Galbraith KL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.
Buzzelli DE
Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rooting out scientific misconduct.
Oransky I; Redman B
Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6679):131. PubMed ID: 38207024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenges for scientists in avoiding plagiarism.
Fisher ER; Partin KM
Account Res; 2014; 21(6):353-65. PubMed ID: 24785995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System.
Tang L; Wang L; Hu G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Nov; 29(6):39. PubMed ID: 37991609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should the government assure scientific integrity?
Klein DF
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 8396939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
Price AR; Daroff RB
Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams.
Hussinger K; Pellens M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215962. PubMed ID: 31048907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
