186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31324833)
1. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
Henninger E; Vasilakos G; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews.
Chen G; Chen S; Zhang XY; Jiang RP; Liu Y; Shi FH; Xu TM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 21457456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superimposition of 3D digital models: A case report.
José Viñas M; Pie de Hierro V; M Ustrell-Torrent J
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):304-313. PubMed ID: 29631813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the superimposition methods and the designated comparison area on accuracy analyses in dentate models.
Limones A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Çakmak G; Abou-Ayash S; Delgado S; Martínez Vázquez de Parga JA; Celemín A
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104939. PubMed ID: 38521237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.
Jang I; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Iijima S; Yozgatian JH; Cha BK; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 19413387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability.
Ganzer N; Feldmann I; Liv P; Bondemark L
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28444179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures.
Vasilakos G; Schilling R; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5838. PubMed ID: 28724930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.
Gkantidis N; Schauseil M; Pazera P; Zorkun B; Katsaros C; Ludwig B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118810. PubMed ID: 25706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of reference areas for superimposition of serial 3D models of patients with advanced periodontitis for volumetric soft tissue evaluation.
Kuralt M; Fidler A
J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jun; 48(6):765-773. PubMed ID: 33576011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
