186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31324833)
21. Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 1: Methodology.
Chen H; Lowe AA; de Almeida FR; Wong M; Fleetham JA; Wang B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 18774086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
Kihara T; Yoshimi Y; Taji T; Murayama T; Tanimoto K; Nikawa H
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode.
Morris RS; Hoye LN; Elnagar MH; Atsawasuwan P; Galang-Boquiren MT; Caplin J; Viana GC; Obrez A; Kusnoto B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 31474272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of Three Digitization Methods for the Dental Arch with Various Tooth Preparation Designs: An In Vitro Study.
Oh KC; Lee B; Park YB; Moon HS
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 30427097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Registration of serial maxillary models via the weighted rugae superimposition method.
Abdi AH; Nouri M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 May; 20(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28150411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A novel method for volumetric assessment of tooth wear using three-dimensional reverse-engineering technology: a preliminary report.
Park J; Choi DS; Jang I; Yook HT; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 24325621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.
Choi DS; Jeong YM; Jang I; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 20482354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 3D morphological measurements of dental casts with occlusal relationship using microfocus X-ray CT.
Kamegawa M; Nakamura M; Tsutsumi S
Dent Mater J; 2008 Jul; 27(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 18833768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models.
An K; Jang I; Choi DS; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 26250456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
