These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31326277)
1. Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia. Huntjens B; Basi M; Nagra M Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 31326277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of subjective and objective conjunctival hyperaemia grading with AOS® Anterior software. Walker MK; Tomiyama ES; Skidmore KV; Assaad JR; Ticak A; Richdale K Clin Exp Optom; 2022 Jul; 105(5):494-499. PubMed ID: 34315357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity and reliability of objective image analysis compared to subjective grading of bulbar hyperaemia. Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1464-6. PubMed ID: 17475716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Bulbar Redness with a Newly Developed Keratograph. Wu S; Hong J; Tian L; Cui X; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):892-9. PubMed ID: 26099055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Chong E; Simpson T; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):244-51. PubMed ID: 10831214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective grading of the anterior eye. Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales. Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new computer assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae. Owen CG; Fitzke FW; Woodward EG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 8944187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ocular Redness Index: a novel automated method for measuring ocular injection. Amparo F; Wang H; Emami-Naeini P; Karimian P; Dana R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4821-6. PubMed ID: 23766472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications. Cardona G; Esterich N PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226960. PubMed ID: 31877190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting Change in Conjunctival Hyperemia Using a Pixel Densitometry Index. Romano V; Steger B; Brunner M; Kaye A; Zheng Y; Willoughby CE; Kaye SB Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2019; 27(2):276-281. PubMed ID: 29095066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hyperemia Analysis Software for Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia Severity. Yoneda T; Sumi T; Hoshikawa Y; Kobayashi M; Fukushima A Curr Eye Res; 2019 Apr; 44(4):376-380. PubMed ID: 30512976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of a new comprehensive pterygia grading scale for use in clinical research and clinical trial. Huang P; Huang J; Tepelus T; Maram J; Sadda S; Lee OL Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2303-2311. PubMed ID: 29080063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non-contact lens wearers. MacKinven J; McGuinness CL; Pascal E; Woods RL Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jan; 78(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 11233330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]