1411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31326480)
1. Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.
Patel KK; Al Badarin F; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Courter S; Kennedy KF; Case JA; McGhie AI; Heller GV; Bateman TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 12(9):1821-1831. PubMed ID: 31326480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease.
Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography.
Husmann L; Wiegand M; Valenta I; Gaemperli O; Schepis T; Siegrist PT; Namdar M; Wyss CA; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jun; 24(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 18158612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
Song YB; Arbab-Zadeh A; Matheson MB; Ostovaneh MR; Vavere AL; Dewey M; Rochitte C; Niinuma H; Laham R; Schuijf JD; Cox C; Brinker J; di Carli M; Lima JAC; Miller JM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007720. PubMed ID: 30764641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of a cardiac PET stress program: comparison of outcomes to the preceding SPECT era.
Knight S; Min DB; Le VT; Meredith KG; Dhar R; Biswas S; Jensen KR; Mason SM; Ethington JD; Lappe DL; Muhlestein JB; Anderson JL; Knowlton KU
JCI Insight; 2018 May; 3(9):. PubMed ID: 29720565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early resting myocardial computed tomography perfusion for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease.
Pursnani A; Lee AM; Mayrhofer T; Ahmed W; Uthamalingam S; Ferencik M; Puchner SB; Bamberg F; Schlett CL; Udelson J; Hoffmann U; Ghoshhajra BB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):e002404. PubMed ID: 25752898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regadenoson dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion using low-dose protocol for evaluation of the ischemic burden. ULYSSES study.
Oleksiak A; Kruk M; Pugliese F; Spiewak M; Milosz-Wieczorek B; Marczak M; Demkow M; Kepka C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):428-436. PubMed ID: 32029383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT-II Trial.
Lubbers M; Coenen A; Kofflard M; Bruning T; Kietselaer B; Galema T; Kock M; Niezen A; Das M; van Gent M; van den Bos EJ; van Woerkens L; Musters P; Kooij S; Nous F; Budde R; Hunink M; Nieman K
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1625-1636. PubMed ID: 29248657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.
Pelletier-Galarneau M; Vandenbroucke E; Lu M; Li O
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 May; 23(1):251. PubMed ID: 37189049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Acquired Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.
Arbab-Zadeh A; Di Carli MF; Cerci R; George RT; Chen MY; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Vavere AL; Betoko A; Plotkin M; Cox C; Clouse ME; Arai AE; Rochitte CE; Lima JA; Brinker J; Miller JM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):e003533. PubMed ID: 26467105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.
Alam L; Omar AMS; Patel KK
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 36826689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine Clinical Quantitative Rest Stress Myocardial Perfusion for Managing Coronary Artery Disease: Clinical Relevance of Test-Retest Variability.
Kitkungvan D; Johnson NP; Roby AE; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):565-577. PubMed ID: 28017383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR
Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging after first-line coronary computed tomography angiography: A multi-center cohort study.
Winther S; Andersen IT; Gormsen LC; Steffensen FH; Nielsen LH; Grove EL; Diederichsen ACP; Urbonaviciene G; Lambrechtsen J; Zaremba T; Elpert FP; Husain M; Zelechowski MW; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M;
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 34475016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Addition to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Symptomatic Patients.
Engbers EM; Timmer JR; Ottervanger JP; Mouden M; Knollema S; Jager PL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 27165700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography.
Berman DS; Maddahi J; Tamarappoo BK; Czernin J; Taillefer R; Udelson JE; Gibson CM; Devine M; Lazewatsky J; Bhat G; Washburn D
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 23265345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
