These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31326542)

  • 21. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
    Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials.
    Yu J; Chen W; Wu P; Li Y
    BJS Open; 2020 Jun; 4(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 32109006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
    Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
    Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012867. PubMed ID: 27864250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
    Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
    Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reporting completeness and transparency of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: A comparison of meta-analyses published before and after the PRISMA statement.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    J Psychosom Res; 2016 Aug; 87():57-69. PubMed ID: 27411753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
    Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of the PRISMA statement to improve the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for patients with heart failure.
    Liu H; Zhou X; Yu G; Sun X
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2019 Jun; 25(3):e12729. PubMed ID: 30790391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study.
    Oh JH; Shin WJ; Park S; Chung JS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Aug; 70(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 28794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature.
    Akhigbe T; Zolnourian A; Bulters D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 May; 39():45-48. PubMed ID: 28246008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
    Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
    Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang ZW; Cheng J; Liu Z; Ma JC; Li JL; Wang J; Yang KH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008066. PubMed ID: 26644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression.
    Zhu Y; Fan L; Zhang H; Wang M; Mei X; Hou J; Shi Z; Shuai Y; Shen Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157808. PubMed ID: 27336624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
    Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA.
    Leclercq V; Beaudart C; Ajamieh S; Rabenda V; Tirelli E; Bruyère O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():46-54. PubMed ID: 31254618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.