These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31326743)

  • 1. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The involvement of cognitive processing in a perceptual-motor process examined with EEG time-frequency analysis.
    Katsumata H; Suzuki K; Tanaka T; Imanaka K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 19136298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
    Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Taylor JA; Domini F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):827-845. PubMed ID: 28853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
    Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.
    Aglioti S; DeSouza JF; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?
    Franz VH
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Aug; 151(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 12851803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object.
    Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Oct; 111(3):473-6. PubMed ID: 8911942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.
    Hu Y; Eagleson R; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 10333011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why some size illusions affect grip aperture.
    Smeets JBJ; Kleijn E; van der Meijden M; Brenner E
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):969-979. PubMed ID: 32185404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.
    Chen Z; Zhang N; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1472-1492. PubMed ID: 34843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.