BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31326858)

  • 1. Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.
    Hyde N; Prutkin JM; Drezner JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 56():81-84. PubMed ID: 31326858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in Swiss elite athletes detected with modern screening criteria.
    Perrin T; Trachsel LD; Schneiter S; Menafoglio A; Albrecht S; Pirrello T; Eser P; Roten L; Gojanovic B; Wilhelm M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14376. PubMed ID: 28102875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased false-positive adolescent pre-athletic screening with Seattle Criteria-interpreted electrocardiograms.
    Colombo JN; Samson RA; Valdes SO; Meziab O; Sisk D; Klewer SE
    Cardiol Young; 2017 Apr; 27(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 27322729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: Consensus statement.
    Drezner JA; Sharma S; Baggish A; Papadakis M; Wilson MG; Prutkin JM; Gerche A; Ackerman MJ; Borjesson M; Salerno JC; Asif IM; Owens DS; Chung EH; Emery MS; Froelicher VF; Heidbuchel H; Adamuz C; Asplund CA; Cohen G; Harmon KG; Marek JC; Molossi S; Niebauer J; Pelto HF; Perez MV; Riding NR; Saarel T; Schmied CM; Shipon DM; Stein R; Vetter VL; Pelliccia A; Corrado D
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 May; 51(9):704-731. PubMed ID: 28258178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes.
    Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kalman J; Lo W; Fallon K; MacIsaac A; Prior D
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23813487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom.
    Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Gabus V; Merghani A; Finocchiaro G; Millar L; Narain R; Papadakis M; Naci H; Tome M; Sharma S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 27515329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of an electrocardiogram workflow model for athletic cardiovascular screening: Primary care network versus sports cardiology interpretation.
    Williamson MD; Grubic N; Moulson N; Johri AM
    J Electrocardiol; 2023; 81():36-40. PubMed ID: 37517199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elite high school athletes: comparison to adolescent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Thompson AJ; Cannon BC; Wackel PL; Horner JM; Ackerman MJ; O'Leary PW; Eidem BW; Johnson JN
    Br J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 50(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 26729893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International Recommendations for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes.
    Sharma S; Drezner JA; Baggish A; Papadakis M; Wilson MG; Prutkin JM; La Gerche A; Ackerman MJ; Borjesson M; Salerno JC; Asif IM; Owens DS; Chung EH; Emery MS; Froelicher VF; Heidbuchel H; Adamuz C; Asplund CA; Cohen G; Harmon KG; Marek JC; Molossi S; Niebauer J; Pelto HF; Perez MV; Riding NR; Saarel T; Schmied CM; Shipon DM; Stein R; Vetter VL; Pelliccia A; Corrado D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 69(8):1057-1075. PubMed ID: 28231933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comments on the New International Criteria for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes.
    Serratosa-Fernández L; Pascual-Figal D; Masiá-Mondéjar MD; Sanz-de la Garza M; Madaria-Marijuan Z; Gimeno-Blanes JR; Adamuz C;
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2017 Nov; 70(11):983-990. PubMed ID: 28928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes.
    Riding NR; Sheikh N; Adamuz C; Watt V; Farooq A; Whyte GP; George KP; Drezner JA; Sharma S; Wilson MG
    Heart; 2015 Mar; 101(5):384-90. PubMed ID: 25502812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes.
    Sharma S; Drezner JA; Baggish A; Papadakis M; Wilson MG; Prutkin JM; La Gerche A; Ackerman MJ; Borjesson M; Salerno JC; Asif IM; Owens DS; Chung EH; Emery MS; Froelicher VF; Heidbuchel H; Adamuz C; Asplund CA; Cohen G; Harmon KG; Marek JC; Molossi S; Niebauer J; Pelto HF; Perez MV; Riding NR; Saarel T; Schmied CM; Shipon DM; Stein R; Vetter VL; Pelliccia A; Corrado D
    Eur Heart J; 2018 Apr; 39(16):1466-1480. PubMed ID: 28329355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addition of the electrocardiogram to the preparticipation examination of college athletes.
    Le VV; Wheeler MT; Mandic S; Dewey F; Fonda H; Perez M; Sungar G; Garza D; Ashley EA; Matheson G; Froelicher V
    Clin J Sport Med; 2010 Mar; 20(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 20215891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modest agreement in ECG interpretation limits the application of ECG screening in young athletes.
    Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kumar S; Lo W; Kalman J; Prior D
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jan; 12(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 25285648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychological impact of electrocardiogram screening in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes.
    Asif IM; Annett S; Ewing JA; Abdelfattah R; Sutphin B; Conley K; Rothmier J; Harmon KG; Drezner JA
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Oct; 51(20):1489-1492. PubMed ID: 28739836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benign and pathological electrocardiographic changes in athletes.
    Machado M; Vaz Silva M
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 34(12):753-70. PubMed ID: 26643438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the Lausanne questionnaire and the 2010 European Society of Cardiology criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.
    Snoek JA; Jongman JK; Brandon T; van Berkel S; van't Hof AW
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 24057687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening.
    Pickham D; Zarafshar S; Sani D; Kumar N; Froelicher V
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 25155389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in athletes: Another limitation in pre-competitive screening.
    Dores H; Ferreira Santos J; Dinis P; Moscoso Costa F; Mendes L; Monge J; Freitas A; de Araújo Gonçalves P; Cardim N; Mendes M
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 36(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 28599797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram-based screening protocols.
    Berte B; Duytschaever M; Elices J; Kataria V; Timmers L; Van Heuverswyn F; Stroobandt R; De Neve J; Watteyne K; Vandensteen E; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R
    Europace; 2015 Sep; 17(9):1435-40. PubMed ID: 25662983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.