311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31327551)
1. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 31708256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cultural adaptation and validation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Turkish use.
Seyyah M; Yurdalan SU
Burns; 2018 Aug; 44(5):1352-1356. PubMed ID: 29580666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns.
Lee SY; Cho YS; Kim L; Joo SY; Seo CH
Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):344-352. PubMed ID: 35459576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns and predictors of burn scar outcome in the first 12 months after burn: The patient's perspective.
Rashaan ZM; Kwa KAA; van der Wal MBA; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Breederveld RS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1283-1290. PubMed ID: 31176509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol.
Klimitz FJ; Neubauer H; Stolle A; Ripper S; Daeschler SC; Aman M; Boecker A; Thomas B; Kneser U; Harhaus L
J Burn Care Res; 2023 Jan; 44(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 36300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled trial of the immediate and long-term effect of massage on adult postburn scar.
Nedelec B; Couture MA; Calva V; Poulin C; Chouinard A; Shashoua D; Gauthier N; Correa JA; de Oliveira A; Mazer B; LaSalle L
Burns; 2019 Feb; 45(1):128-139. PubMed ID: 30626496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The recovery of post-burn hypertrophic scar in a monitored pressure therapy intervention programme and the timing of intervention.
Li P; Li-Tsang CWP; Deng X; Wang X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Tan Z; He C
Burns; 2018 Sep; 44(6):1451-1467. PubMed ID: 29887351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporation of 3D stereophotogrammetry as a reliable method for assessing scar volume in standard clinical practice.
Peake M; Pan K; Rotatori RM; Powell H; Fowler L; James L; Dale E
Burns; 2019 Nov; 45(7):1614-1620. PubMed ID: 31208769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between high-frequency ultrasonography and histological assessment reveals weak correlation for measurements of scar tissue thickness.
Agabalyan NA; Su S; Sinha S; Gabriel V
Burns; 2017 May; 43(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 28109548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
