154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31328399)
1. Unconditional and conditional monetary incentives to increase response to mailed questionnaires: A randomized controlled study within a trial (SWAT).
Young B; Bedford L; das Nair R; Gallant S; Littleford R; Robertson JFR; Schembri S; Sullivan FM; Vedhara K; Kendrick D;
J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 26(3):893-902. PubMed ID: 31328399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conditional versus non-conditional incentives to maximise return of participant completed questionnaires in clinical trials: a cluster randomised study within a trial.
Cook J; Cook JA; Bongard E; Heneghan C; Butler CC
Trials; 2023 Nov; 24(1):710. PubMed ID: 37936228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.
Edwards PJ; Roberts I; Clarke MJ; DiGuiseppi C; Woolf B; Perkins C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Nov; 11(11):MR000008. PubMed ID: 38032037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
Robb KA; Gatting L; Wardle J
Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):671-685. PubMed ID: 28422369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an incentive strategy on the questionnaire response rate in parents of premature babies: a randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT) nested within SIFT.
Juszczak E; Hewer O; Partlett C; Hurd M; Bari V; Bowler U; Linsell L; Dorling J;
Trials; 2021 Aug; 22(1):554. PubMed ID: 34419121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive study.
Gates S; Williams MA; Withers E; Williamson E; Mt-Isa S; Lamb SE
Trials; 2009 Jun; 10():44. PubMed ID: 19545427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized control trial of unconditional versus conditional incentives to increase study enrollment rates in participants at increased risk of lung cancer.
Kumar AD; Durham DD; Lane L; Perera P; Rivera MP; Henderson LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():11-17. PubMed ID: 34469801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mehta SJ; Pepe RS; Gabler NB; Kanneganti M; Reitz C; Saia C; Teel J; Asch DA; Volpp KG; Doubeni CA
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e191156. PubMed ID: 30901053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unconditional and conditional incentives differentially improved general practitioners' participation in an online survey: randomized controlled trial.
Young JM; O'Halloran A; McAulay C; Pirotta M; Forsdike K; Stacey I; Currow D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):693-7. PubMed ID: 25450450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of different unconditional monetary incentives on survey response rates in men with prostate cancer: a 2-arm randomised trial.
McIntosh M; Opozda MJ; O'Callaghan M; Vincent AD; Galvão DA; Short CE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):252. PubMed ID: 36175831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the effects of an offer of a monetary incentive on the rate of questionnaire return during follow-up of a clinical trial: a randomised study within a trial.
Hardy P; Bell JL; Brocklehurst P;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 27421268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A monetary incentive increases postal survey response rates for pharmacists.
Paul CL; Walsh RA; Tzelepis F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1099-101. PubMed ID: 16286502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.
Rosoff PM; Werner C; Clipp EC; Guill AB; Bonner M; Demark-Wahnefried W
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1330-2. PubMed ID: 15894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I; Cooper R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000008. PubMed ID: 17443629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No difference in response rate to a mailed survey among prostate cancer survivors using conditional versus unconditional incentives.
Evans BR; Peterson BL; Demark-Wahnefried W
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Feb; 13(2):277-8. PubMed ID: 14973100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial.
van der Mark LB; van Wonderen KE; Mohrs J; Bindels PJ; Puhan MA; Ter Riet G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Dec; 12():186. PubMed ID: 23249323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials.
Khadjesari Z; Murray E; Kalaitzaki E; White IR; McCambridge J; Thompson SG; Wallace P; Godfrey C
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Mar; 13(1):e26. PubMed ID: 21371988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 2x2 randomised factorial SWAT of the use of a pen and small, financial incentive to improve recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for older adults with multimorbidity.
Fairhurst C; Roche J; Bissell L; Hewitt C; Hugill-Jones J; Howsam J; Maturana CS; Corbacho Martin B; Paul SS; Rose F; Torgerson DJ; Ward L; Wiley L; Tew GA
F1000Res; 2021; 10():326. PubMed ID: 35444795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brueton VC; Tierney JF; Stenning S; Meredith S; Harding S; Nazareth I; Rait G
BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e003821. PubMed ID: 24496696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.
Halpern SD; Ubel PA; Berlin JA; Asch DA
Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9):834-9. PubMed ID: 12218773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
