These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31329284)

  • 1. An analysis of the value of token reinforcement using a multiple-schedule assessment.
    Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Lauderdale-Littin S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):563-571. PubMed ID: 31329284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism.
    Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Delmolino L; Sloman KN; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 25930718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers.
    Bonfonte SA; Bourret JC; Lloveras LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 31930500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using objects of obsession as token reinforcers for children with autism.
    Charlop-Christy MH; Haymes LK
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1998 Jun; 28(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 9656130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of token value and effectiveness: A replication.
    Hangen MM; Romero AN; Norris HM; Gorycki KA; Roberts BR; Neidert PL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Oct Autumn (Fall); 56(4):898-913. PubMed ID: 37485744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistence of stereotypic behavior: examining the effects of external reinforcers.
    Ahearn WH; Clark KM; Gardenier NC; Chung BI; Dube WV
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 14768664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Substitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeons.
    Andrade LF; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 28000221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incentivizing physical activity using token reinforcement with preschool children.
    Patel RR; Normand MP; Kohn CS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):499-515. PubMed ID: 30637721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D; Ingvarsson ET; Haggar JL; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patterns.
    Penrod B; Wallace MD; Dyer EJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 18595282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
    Egel AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
    Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
    Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Lerman DC; Call NA; Addison LR; Kodak T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 18595284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized conditioned reinforcement with pigeons in a token economy.
    DeFulio A; Yankelevitz R; Bullock C; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):26-46. PubMed ID: 24979723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.
    Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Milstein JP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(4):795-808. PubMed ID: 1478903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.