These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31329357)

  • 1. Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials.
    Liao G; Zhao Z; Deng H; Li X
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e2027. PubMed ID: 31329357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Li L; Zhang W; Guo Y; Wang X; Yu H; Du B; Yang X; Luo Y
    Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 31081483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Pérez A; Carra MC; Brunetti F; de'Angelis N
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):e165665. PubMed ID: 28196217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qiu H; Yu D; Ye S; Shan R; Ai J; Shi J
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():225-230. PubMed ID: 32251720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Huang YJ; Kang YN; Huang YM; Wu AT; Wang W; Wei PL
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 30609955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical, pathological, and oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    Han C; Yan P; Jing W; Li M; Du B; Si M; Yang J; Yang K; Cai H; Guo T
    Asian J Surg; 2020 Sep; 43(9):880-890. PubMed ID: 31964585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4498-4505. PubMed ID: 29721748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of circumferential resection margin positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ishizuka M; Shibuya N; Hachiya H; Nishi Y; Kono T; Takayanagi M; Nemoto T; Ihara K; Shiraki T; Matsumoto T; Mori S; Nakamura T; Aoki T; Mizushima T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108538. PubMed ID: 39053042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Khan MH; Tahir A; Hussain A; Monis A; Zahid S; Fatima M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Sep; 409(1):269. PubMed ID: 39225912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
    Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Burati M; Velotti N; Milone F; De Palma GD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204887. PubMed ID: 30300377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The urinary and sexual outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Zhou L
    Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):397-406. PubMed ID: 36943447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Mizera M; Witowski J; Torbicz G; Major P; Pisarska M; Wysocki M; Budzyński A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):595-604. PubMed ID: 28795243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.