238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31332563)
1. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete intersphincteric longitudinal muscle excision May Be key to reducing local recurrence during intersphincteric resection.
Kim JC; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 33642088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: the risk is functional rather than oncological. A 25-year experience from Bordeaux.
Denost Q; Moreau JB; Vendrely V; Celerier B; Rullier A; Assenat V; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 32649005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.
Kim JC; Lim SB; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim CW; Kim CN
Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2734-44. PubMed ID: 24687417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Yamada K; Ogata S; Saiki Y; Fukunaga M; Tsuji Y; Takano M
Br J Surg; 2007 Oct; 94(10):1272-7. PubMed ID: 17671960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.
Yamada K; Saiki Y; Takano S; Iwamoto K; Tanaka M; Fukunaga M; Noguchi T; Nakamura Y; Hisano S; Fukami K; Kuwahara D; Tsuji Y; Takano M; Usuku K; Ikeda T; Sugihara K
Surg Today; 2019 Apr; 49(4):275-285. PubMed ID: 30604217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Chamlou R; Parc Y; Simon T; Bennis M; Dehni N; Parc R; Tiret E
Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):916-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18043092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
