These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Computational approaches for Akcapinar GB; Sezerman OU Biosci Rep; 2017 Apr; 37(2):. PubMed ID: 28167677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Progress in computational protein design. Lippow SM; Tidor B Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17644370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An accurate binding interaction model in de novo computational protein design of interactions: if you build it, they will bind. London N; Ambroggio X J Struct Biol; 2014 Feb; 185(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 23558036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bottom-up de novo design of functional proteins with complex structural features. Yang C; Sesterhenn F; Bonet J; van Aalen EA; Scheller L; Abriata LA; Cramer JT; Wen X; Rosset S; Georgeon S; Jardetzky T; Krey T; Fussenegger M; Merkx M; Correia BE Nat Chem Biol; 2021 Apr; 17(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 33398169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Achievements and Challenges in Computational Protein Design. Samish I Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():21-94. PubMed ID: 27914045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of Molecular Dynamics Based Predictions into the Optimization of De Novo Protein Designs: Limitations and Benefits. Carvalho HF; Barbosa AJ; Roque AC; Iranzo O; Branco RJ Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():181-201. PubMed ID: 27914051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Brief History of De Novo Protein Design: Minimal, Rational, and Computational. Woolfson DN J Mol Biol; 2021 Oct; 433(20):167160. PubMed ID: 34298061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational design of a leucine-rich repeat protein with a predefined geometry. Rämisch S; Weininger U; Martinsson J; Akke M; André I Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(50):17875-80. PubMed ID: 25427795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in computational protein design. Park S; Yang X; Saven JG Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Aug; 14(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 15313244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construction of proteins with molecular recognition capabilities using α3β3 de novo protein scaffolds. Okura H; Mihara H; Takahashi T Protein Eng Des Sel; 2013 Oct; 26(10):705-11. PubMed ID: 24046439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New computational protein design methods for de novo small molecule binding sites. Lucas JE; Kortemme T PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1008178. PubMed ID: 33017412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast, cheap and out of control--Insights into thermodynamic and informatic constraints on natural protein sequences from de novo protein design. Brisendine JM; Koder RL Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 May; 1857(5):485-492. PubMed ID: 26498191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. De Novo Design of Four-Helix Bundle Metalloproteins: One Scaffold, Diverse Reactivities. Lombardi A; Pirro F; Maglio O; Chino M; DeGrado WF Acc Chem Res; 2019 May; 52(5):1148-1159. PubMed ID: 30973707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein Engineering Approaches in the Post-Genomic Era. Singh RK; Lee JK; Selvaraj C; Singh R; Li J; Kim SY; Kalia VC Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2018; 19(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 27855603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]