These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31336361)
1. Hybrid venous recanalization and cardiac implantable electronic device lead revision procedures: A single-center retrospective analysis of 38 patients. Sherk WM; Khaja MS; Good ED; Cunnane RT; Dasika NL; Williams DM Clin Imaging; 2019; 58():145-151. PubMed ID: 31336361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of laser lead extraction sheath in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for cardiac implantable electronic device lead upgrade or revision. Al-Maisary S; Romano G; Karck M; De Simone R; Kremer J PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251829. PubMed ID: 33989335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chronic venous obstruction during cardiac device revision: Incidence, predictors, and efficacy of percutaneous techniques to overcome the stenosis. Morani G; Bolzan B; Valsecchi S; Morosato M; Ribichini FL Heart Rhythm; 2020 Feb; 17(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 31404660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical power sheath mediated recanalization and lead implantation in patients with venous occlusion: Technique and results. Witte OA; Adiyaman A; van Bemmel MW; Smit JJJ; Ghani A; Misier ARR; Elvan A; Delnoy PPHM J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):316-321. PubMed ID: 29131449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laser lead extraction to facilitate cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade and revision in the presence of central venous obstruction. Sohal M; Williams S; Akhtar M; Shah A; Chen Z; Wright M; O'Neill M; Patel N; Hamid S; Cooklin M; Bucknall C; Bostock J; Gill J; Rinaldi CA Europace; 2014 Jan; 16(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23794614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Association Between Venous Occlusion and Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. Keyser A; Jungbauer C; Rennert J; Linnemann B; Schmid C; Schopka S Angiology; 2022 Mar; 73(3):252-259. PubMed ID: 34362260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of preoperative venography in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices submitted to lead replacement or device upgrade procedures. Albertini CMM; Silva KRD; Leal Filho JMDM; Crevelari ES; Martinelli Filho M; Carnevale FC; Costa R Arq Bras Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 111(5):686-696. PubMed ID: 30281686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence, management, and prediction of venous access site occlusion in patients undergoing lead revision surgery. Kellnar A; Fichtner S; Reitinger P; Sadoni S; Heyn O; Sams L; Estner HL; Lackermair K Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 381():16-19. PubMed ID: 37044179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study. Jeong S; Nam GB; Chang JW; Kim MJ; Han Y; Kwon TW; Cho YP BMC Nephrol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):281. PubMed ID: 30342493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Central vein stenosis or occlusion associated with cardiac rhythm management device leads in hemodialysis patients with ipsilateral arteriovenous access: a retrospective study of treatment using stents or stent-grafts. Saad TF; Myers GR; Cicone J J Vasc Access; 2010; 11(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 20658455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is Venoplasty an Alternative to Lead Extraction for Patients With Venous Obstruction? Gomes S; Mamo AA; Cummins L; Kushwaha V Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Mar; 30(3):419-422. PubMed ID: 32771385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Redo procedures and chronic renal dysfunction are associated with higher risk of cardiac electronic device infections. Morani G; Mugnai G; Bolzan B; Morosato M; Tomasi L; Ferrari S; Vassanelli C Minerva Cardioangiol; 2018 Jun; 66(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 29308851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bundled skin antiseptic preparation for complex cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a propensity-score matching cohort study. Chen HC; Lee WC; Chen YL; Tsai TH; Pan KL; Lin YS; Chen MC J Hosp Infect; 2019 Nov; 103(3):311-320. PubMed ID: 31449919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-Center Retrospective Review of Radiofrequency Wire Recanalization of Refractory Central Venous Occlusions. Keller EJ; Gupta SA; Bondarev S; Sato KT; Vogelzang RL; Resnick SA J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1571-1577. PubMed ID: 30293732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in hemodialysis patients: prevalence and implications for arteriovenous hemodialysis access interventions. Saad TF; Ahmed W; Davis K; Jurkovitz C Semin Dial; 2015; 28(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 24863543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of lead revision for myocardial perforation after cardiac implantable electronic device placement. Huang XM; Fu HX; Zhong L; Osborn MJ; Asirvatham SJ; Sinak LJ; Cao J; Friedman PA; Cha YM J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1119-24. PubMed ID: 24863054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recanalization of chronic refractory central venous occlusions utilizing a radiofrequency guidewire perforation technique. Kundu S; Modabber M; You JM; Tam P J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 22865527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of hemostatic markers as venous stenosis or occlusion predictors following first transvenous cardiac device implantation. Cacko A; Kozyra-Pydyś E; Gawałko M; Opolski G; Grabowski M Cardiol J; 2021; 28(5):690-696. PubMed ID: 30912577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]