164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31337450)
1. Health Technology Assessment of Public Health Interventions Published 2012 to 2016: An Analysis of Characteristics and Comparison of Methods.
Polus S; Mathes T; Klingler C; Messer M; Gerhardus A; Stegbauer C; Willms G; Ehrenreich H; Marckmann G; Pieper D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(4):280-290. PubMed ID: 31337450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods-study protocol.
Mathes T; Willms G; Polus S; Stegbauer C; Messer M; Klingler C; Ehrenreich H; Niebuhr D; Marckmann G; Gerhardus A; Pieper D
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 29792224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content.
Cyr PR; Jain V; Chalkidou K; Ottersen T; Gopinathan U
Health Policy; 2021 Aug; 125(8):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 34112508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTIONS: A SYNTHESIS OF METHODOLOGICAL GUIDANCE.
Mathes T; Antoine SL; Prengel P; Bühn S; Polus S; Pieper D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):135-146. PubMed ID: 28434414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.
Wahlster P; Brereton L; Burns J; Hofmann B; Mozygemba K; Oortwijn W; Pfadenhauer L; Polus S; Rehfuess E; Schilling I; van der Wilt GJ; Gerhardus A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):544-551. PubMed ID: 28756780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATING VARIOUS ASPECTS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
Lysdahl KB; Mozygemba K; Burns J; Brönneke JB; Chilcott JB; Ward S; Hofmann B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):570-576. PubMed ID: 28780928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?
Dalziel K; Round A; Stein K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Payne L
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jan; 9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. PubMed ID: 15588556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment.
Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D; Poulsen PB; Horder M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15736519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects.
Sacchini D; Virdis A; Refolo P; Pennacchini M; de Paula IC
Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Nov; 12(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19507050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations--a comparative analysis.
Mathes T; Jacobs E; Morfeld JC; Pieper D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Sep; 13():371. PubMed ID: 24079858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment.
Hofmann B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 16110710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HTA and its legal issues: a framework for identifying legal issues in health technology assessment.
Widrig D; Tag B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Dec; 30(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 25816824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: state of the art.
Lee A; Skött LS; Hansen HP
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 19845983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review.
Stich AK; Mozygemba K; Lysdahl KB; Pfadenhauer LM; Hofmann B; van der Wilt GJ; Gerhardus A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 30919794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review.
Ascef BO; Lopes ACF; de Soárez PC
Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Aug; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 32843051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLIED METHODS.
Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 30345948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nutrition and health technology assessment: when two worlds meet.
Poley MJ
Front Pharmacol; 2015; 6():232. PubMed ID: 26539116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports.
Hansen HP; Lee A; van Randwijk CB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 22004773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
