206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31338654)
1. The clinical value of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in pneumoconiosis patients.
Choi EK; Park HL; Yoo IR; Kim SJ; Kim YK
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):442-451. PubMed ID: 31338654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis between (18)F-FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer and benign nodes on dual-time point PET/CT scan.
Suga K; Kawakami Y; Hiyama A; Sugi K; Okabe K; Matsumoto T; Ueda K; Tanaka N; Matsunaga N
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 23(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19444550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic utility of metabolic parameters on FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis in patients with cN2 non-small cell lung cancer.
Nakanishi K; Nakamura S; Sugiyama T; Kadomatsu Y; Ueno H; Goto M; Ozeki N; Fukui T; Iwano S; Chen-Yoshikawa TF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):983. PubMed ID: 34474680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is FDG-PET/CT used correctly in the combined approach for nodal staging in NSCLC patients?
Simsek FS; Comak A; Asik M; Kuslu D; Balci TA; Ulutas H; Koroglu R; Kekilli E; Akatli A; Elmali F; Yalcin NC; Akyol H
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 23(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 32525121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical value of (18)F-FDGPET/CT in differentiation between benign lesions and lung cancer for large shadows in patients with pneumoconiosis].
Wang Y; Zhang H; Cui X; Fang N; Zeng L; Zhang C
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 32(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 24641846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary clinical assessment of dynamic
Shinya T; Otomi Y; Kubo M; Kinoshita M; Takechi K; Uyama N; Yamanaka M; Terazawa K; Toba H; Bando Y; Otsuka H; Harada M
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jun; 33(6):414-423. PubMed ID: 30911883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decision tree model for predicting mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT.
Pak K; Kim K; Kim MH; Eom JS; Lee MK; Cho JS; Kim YS; Kim BS; Kim SJ; Kim IJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193403. PubMed ID: 29486012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) and Tumor Markers to Diagnose Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective and Prospective Study.
Zhai X; Guo Y; Qian X
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e922675. PubMed ID: 32483109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combination of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and chest thin-layer high-resolution computed tomography for evaluation of pulmonary nodules: Correlation with imaging features, maximum standardized uptake value, and pathology.
Hou S; Lin X; Wang S; Shen Y; Meng Z; Jia Q; Tan J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(31):e11640. PubMed ID: 30075545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiomic Analysis using Density Threshold for FDG-PET/CT-Based N-Staging in Lung Cancer Patients.
Flechsig P; Frank P; Kratochwil C; Antoch G; Rath D; Moltz J; Rieser M; Warth A; Kauczor HU; Schwartz LH; Haberkorn U; Giesel FL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Apr; 19(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 27539308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is SUVmax Helpful in the Differential Diagnosis of Enlarged Mediastinal Lymph Nodes? A Pilot Study.
Yu C; Xia X; Qin C; Sun X; Zhang Y; Lan X
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():3417190. PubMed ID: 30510493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Density and SUV ratios from PET/CT in the detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer].
Shao T; Yu L; Li Y; Chen M
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 18(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 25800571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ratio of lymph node to primary tumor SUVmax multiplied by maximal tumor diameter on positron emission tomography/integrated computed tomography may be a predictor of mediastinal lymph node malignancy in lung cancer.
Liu Y; Tang Y; Xue Z; Yang P; Ma K; Ma G; Chu X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(46):e5457. PubMed ID: 27861398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic Lymph Node Staging by Combined
Pichler R; De Zordo T; Fritz J; Kroiss A; Aigner F; Heidegger I; Virgolini I; Horninger W; Uprimny C
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):e387-e395. PubMed ID: 27601364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving diagnostic performance of
Yang DD; Mirvis E; Goldring J; Patel ARC; Wagner T
Clin Radiol; 2019 Oct; 74(10):818.e17-818.e23. PubMed ID: 31420186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Bladder Cancer using Maximum Standardised Uptake Value and
Vind-Kezunovic S; Bouchelouche K; Ipsen P; Høyer S; Bell C; Bjerggaard Jensen J
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28753817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. F-18-FDG-avid lymph node metastasis along preferential lymphatic drainage pathways from the tumor-bearing lung lobe on F-18-FDG PET/CT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Shigemoto Y; Suga K; Matsunaga N
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 May; 30(4):287-97. PubMed ID: 27007128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
