These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31338665)

  • 1. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G
    Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
    Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases.
    Hobeika C; Tribillon E; Marchese U; Faermark N; Ghedira A; Bonnet S; Nassar A; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Surgery; 2021 Nov; 170(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 34176600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of a modified three-level classification in stratifying open liver resection procedures in terms of complexity and postoperative morbidity.
    Kawaguchi Y; Hasegawa K; Tzeng CD; Mizuno T; Arita J; Sakamoto Y; Chun YS; Aloia TA; Kokudo N; Vauthey JN
    Br J Surg; 2020 Feb; 107(3):258-267. PubMed ID: 31603540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification.
    Kawaguchi Y; Fuks D; Kokudo N; Gayet B
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jan; 267(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 28187043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
    Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2024 Jul; 90(7):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 38520138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases.
    Goh BK; Wang Z; Koh YX; Lim KI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Oct; 50(10):742-750. PubMed ID: 34755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.
    Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
    Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graduated Autonomy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection Based on Liver Resection Complexity: A Western and Eastern Bi-Institution Study for Learning Curve.
    Mazzotta AD; Kawaguchi Y; Ito K; Abe S; Samer D; Tribillon E; Gayet B; Hasegawa K; Soubrane O
    J Am Coll Surg; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39166755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the difficulty grade of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases correlate with long-term outcomes?
    Hołówko W; Triantafyllidis I; Neuberg M; Tabchouri N; Beaussier M; Bennamoun M; Sarran A; Lefevre M; Louvet C; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1620-1627. PubMed ID: 32561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.
    Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
    HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.
    Periyasamy M; Cho JY; Ahn S; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Jang JS; Kwon SU; Kim S; Choi JK; Guro H
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5209-5218. PubMed ID: 28526962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
    Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections.
    Linn YL; Wu AG; Han HS; Liu R; Chen KH; Fuks D; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Geller D; Cheung TT; Edwin B; Aldrighetti L; Abu Hilal M; Troisi RI; Wakabayashi G; Goh BKP;
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):36-59. PubMed ID: 35780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility and outcomes of multiple simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections.
    Nassar A; Tribillon E; Marchese U; Faermark N; Bonnet S; Beaussier M; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2466-2472. PubMed ID: 33966122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection.
    Krenzien F; Wabitsch S; Haber P; Kamali C; Brunnbauer P; Benzing C; Atanasov G; Wakabayashi G; Öllinger R; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):403-411. PubMed ID: 30076767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
    Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
    BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.